Public Voice Network
- London in 3 days 2626
- ffffound invitations 1717
- Introducing a cat to a do… 66
- Help! 1111
- working in Canada 66
- Who here owns? 6464
- blog 2349523495
- EC: Build - Pritt 1010
- Masters of Poster 5252
- Pul Fittion 44
- AIGA Gain Conference 22
- post your local heros! 22
- www.martin-brown.net 1313
- Market theme affiliate pr… 11
- Car photography 66
- QBN+ Challenge 5 154154
- Scooters & Vespas 2828
- London SEO companies 44
- Agencies in Amsterdam? 99
- EC: Dimension Hatröss 1212
- Qwitter 160160
- Last day on the Job 3737
- flash/php multi user apps 66
- Pic of the Day 70947094
Viacom vs. Google(Youtube) 1717 Responses
Last post: 1 month, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Jul 4, 08, 1:17 a.m.
- rafalski
http://www.guardian.co.uk/techno…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp…- Jul 4, 08, 1:17 a.m. – Permalink
- omgitsacamera
http://www.qbn.com/topics/557129…
Big Brother: 1 - Citizen 0


- Dog-earJul 4, 08, 1:32 a.m. – Permalink
- BaskerviIle
I think the future for YouTube will be providing legal content, ie user uploaded videos that they've made themselves, or things that are out of copyright.
As more and more tv channels go down the route of on demand, free players (iPlayer, 4OD) with full length programs, there will be less need for copyrighted content to even be put youtube. Plus youtube is limited to short clips.The fact that southpark have made all their episode availbe for free is a sign of things to come.
Youtube should start trying to change now and get all the studios they pissed off on board. They may be able to get consent to let studios give them short clips or older material, or even use their expertise in helping them set up their own video sites.
Alternatively they could split youtube down the middle: the free user driven stuff, and then a separate section for approved copyrighted material.Either they will need to accept change or lose ground to the ever growing on demand sites


- Dog-earJul 4, 08, 4:48 a.m. – Permalink
- moth
Very optimistic BaskerviIle.
However, radiohead proved that sometimes you can't even give something away without someone wanting to steal it instead.I personally foresee ISP's blocking all copyrighted content, and then charging for access. You'll pay a flat subscription to access all that content - much like your TV license.


- Dog-earJul 4, 08, 5:22 a.m. – Permalink
- BaskerviIle
Stephen Fry has written a great piece on the subject of the future of the liscense fee and has read it in his most recent podcast, it's worth listening to, he makes some interesting points:
http://www.stephenfry.com/podcas…

- Dog-earJul 4, 08, 5:30 a.m. – Permalink
- oozie
what can they actually do with this info? kelpie brought up a point I was thinking how much this data is actually worth to viacom way beyond copyright infringment etc. there is must be some nudge nudge wink wink going on between google and viacom over this entire court battle. copyright is besides the point I'm sure...like any large media company could sue google or anyone to get all their data and exploit it


- Dog-earJul 4, 08, 11:09 a.m. – Permalink
- roundabout
hahahaha, good luck with that then!


- Dog-earJul 4, 08, 1:24 p.m. – Permalink


