Public Voice Network
- Favorite brands 6363
- blog 3130431304
- Tom Sachs: Custom Sharpie 55
- Least favourite brands 4444
- ffffound invite swapshop 525525
- God is quite busy 124124
- DEC. 5th, Sinterklaas 11
- freshbooks 1717
- QBN+ Challenge 6 156156
- Quick Survey for Philosop… 3737
- Honda set to pull out of …
- Pictures of Girls With He… 1313
- EC: WK 33
- Chick of the Day 17291729
- Seattle Tattoo 11
- EC: Freiler Updates 66
- PSD / AI Question 33
- You can be Santa Claus! 55
- QBN 3232
- Aquarium owners 2424
- 1st thursday portland 33
- Sweet! 1717
- The Big Lebowski 112112
- Bush Buys House in Dallas 1111
ec: Jo Longhurst 33 Responses
Last post: 5 months, 1 week ago | Thread started: Jun 25, 08, 9:54 a.m.
Out of context: Response #3 [Jun 25, 08, 9:54 a.m.]
- schmutzi
I think the statement just tries to establish the broad, abstract theme of her work. So i guess there´s really nothing to understand there, it´s not math. Just relations/reflections between man/fashion/pet as design object/etc. helpful?


- View thread


