crit web
- Started
- Last post
- 23 Responses
- trooper
its 70% there with content which wont be designed in until i have 100% of it... however all the key pages are there.
a much larger website is under production but thats a while away ;)
- kelpie0
Everything looks very nice but the javascript interfaces are a bit jerky; I'm not sure why they're there either to be honest but all the icons, gradients etc look very pretty.
The content only pages could do with being jazzed up a bit, and when I click on an FAQ I wouldn't mind a back button to get to the list.
like the colours and the graphics' design, think the html/css stuff could be more in line with that.
- Jnr_Madison0
Would be good if it was in the center on the screen too.
- moth0
You should be able to just about read those packages with the zoom.... There's too much zoom.
- kelpie0
you know what I think is the thing that's really bugging me about the zoom interface on teh price plans? when I move my mouse down toward the "more info" button the thing gets smaller. that's annoying. can you constrain the effect to horizontal mouse movements only?
- Fariska0
The zoom rollovers are a bit too nervous, try to smooth them
And the green is really ok on the frontpage and on the navbar, but on the inner pages is pretty heavy, possibly a white bg with a subtle green-ish gradient would be lighter.
- liveforever0
when u click on the javascript zoom things it takes u to another screen. theres no way of navigating back to them without clicking on a different link and then clicking on packages links again
- jevad0
Holy fucking green.
Would be nice to see some contrast - or am I the only one being overpowered by its greenness?
- arseni0
Poor navigation in FAQ. Once you choose one Question, you can't go back.
On About Us and The Service highlight the section that's currently being displayed.
- janne760
black's not really black, some icons look badly compressed gif's, in FAQ you need some sort of back button after each Q&A, and try to dim all that green a little.
- drgs0
i luv it
make the logo bigger (no joke), bolder header
- Point50
question: on http://www.broadbond.com/service… with the js magnify-type graphic menu, how does that resolution stay consistent between the smaller size and magnified size of the images? svg? or is the magnified size the base size and the js is interpolating the image into a smaller size?
- janne760
imho, the scaling has no functional value here:
http://www.BroadBond.com/package…so much space, they can easily fit in there large.
people will think some creative is just trying to get attention...
- 23kon0
in the FAQ section you could do with a submenu or back to FAQ button rather than relying on user using browser back button.
i was going to suggest text instead of images but i saw above you have added text into the code for search engines to see.
also can see the edges of some of your zooming png's and the corners bigtime
- kelpie0
I know this is the really cheeky NT crit thing to do, so apologies in advance but why the zoom thing instead of just this:
imho, the 3 up presented simply like that would make for a better page and display your nice graphics better too...
just interested in your thinking, is this one of thise clients that assumes value for money from design ONLY if something is moving
- digdre0
it's ok, but the green in the rllover is awefull
- 23kon0
agree with kelpie - the best use of the page would be to have it with each package displayed equally like this.
- jandiroo0
overall looks cool, but the js rollovers... mmmm.... the whole site looks static, it'd keep it that way
and i'd make the logo a little bigger yes.....
=)
- jevad0
I really would knock the green body bg color back in opacity...to like 50%