Public Voice Network
- london 2010... 2828
- Bottled water is bullshit 3232
- disable skype plugin 55
- Graphic items for sale. 22
- 30 days left 7272
- Am I wrong? 2626
- Asshole upstairs 1111
- Your latest DESIGN purcha… 107107
- Ultimately… 66
- If I ruled the world 1212
- Robert Murraine 1414
- Multi-Grid Pattern 2222
- Vid of the Day 333333
- Fixie/ fixed bikes 5454
- Tittiepography 55
- blog 2101021010
- Gonzo 2323
- Any good graduates? 3939
- Le Tour de France 3333
- Pic of the Day 57165716
- Hire Me Please 2424
- Best. Soundtrack. 4545
- fat fonts 2222
- design comps 44
Typeface suggestions pls 2323 Responses
Last post: 1 month, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: May 12, 08, 11:28 a.m.
- gramme
I am FINALLY starting to work on the new identity for my church, after talking about it for a year. We're Presbyterian, orthodox, and fairly traditional, but very involved in the local community. There is a growing number of young people like myself, so it feels less stuffy and buttoned-up these days.
Would like to gather some typographic suggestions. I'm liking fonts that have a 17th–18th. c. feel to them, like something you might find in an old Scottish or Dutch book. Also working with some more contemporary American options. Have been using Mercury, Caslon, Benton, Minion, Gotham & Trade Gothic. I'm avoiding fonts that feel very Italian or French like Bembo, Jenson or Garamond. I think Trajan works for some of the directions I'm taking, but I'm SICK of seeing it everywhere. I've been eyeing Penumbra as a possibility.
I feel like I need more options. Suggestions please, and thanks billions.
- May 12, 08, 11:28 a.m. – Permalink
- moamoa
Hightower
http://www.fontbureau.com/fonts/…Kepler
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/ado…I think Erasmus could be pretty good fot his Project
http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/d…or Goldenbook
http://www.fonthaus.com/products…
- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 11:36 a.m. – Permalink
- Josev
Hightower is a pretty cool font.
Weiss came to mind too:
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/ado…

- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 11:47 a.m. – Permalink
- Knuckleberry
ITC Satan

- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 1:17 p.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
use symbols. religious people love them and you could make a distinguished looking mark for them. all that religious iconography.


- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 2:05 p.m. – Permalink
- gramme
I am using Symbols as well as type-only versions. Our church's name is Twin Oaks, which works out wonderfully. The obvious solution (too obvious?) is some rendition of the Presbyterian cross, which is a cross (T) with a halo behind (O).
It's also nice that a T looks like a tree, and that when split down the middle it creates two mirrored halves.


- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 3:47 p.m. – Permalink
- Knuckleberry
Hoefler Text?


- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 3:54 p.m. – Permalink
- Knuckleberry
Go straight up Gutenberg: Fette Haenel Fraktur

- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 3:55 p.m. – Permalink
- gramme
Related question for you guys. This job is an "official" job at my studio, this isn't freelance. Here's the deal: our typical practice with new identity projects is to open up the initial rounds to the whole print design team. Normally, that's fine and great. However...this is my church, I wrestled this client to the ground and brought it in for my boss, and it is obviously something with which I am personally connected. My boss told me months ago when we started talking about the project that she'd open it up to the office. Usually, whichever designer's logo gets chosen, that person becomes the lead designer on subsequent projects for that particular client. Fine, great – I'm a full team player on every other project. When I raised concerns about following this process w/ the church project to my boss, she said "Oh don't worry – you'll design it for sure." So then, if my role as the design lead for my church is a foregone conclusion, why include the rest of the office? Why waste their time? Am I missing something here? Does she not think that between me & her we can pull this thing off? How would you guys feel/act in this situation?


- Dog-earMay 13, 08, 7:20 a.m. – Permalink

