NASA announcement
- Started
- Last post
- 181 Responses
- Drno0
I have a good friend that works at the second squadron of ipolyetic control at the NASA,
he just told me his concern about the disappearance of scientist around the world.
Apparently a crucial experiment didn't go quite well and they will reveal it to the world next week if they can't find a suitable solution....
- they are looking for the black hole that left the building, right?ribit
- Drno0
guys guys guys,
we all need to calm down, NO NEED TO SCREEEEEAM AND RUNNNN LIKE FOOLS
KEEP IT NICE AND CALM
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
*capslock suicide
- Jimbo820
I'm scared...
What time is it happening GMT?
- mikotondria30
Your search - ipolyetic - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
* Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
* Try different keywords.
* Try more general keywords.
- teleos0
I am in no need of self-validation. That would be your first error. And I do not assume that we "should have already found evidence of life". I actually affirm the plausibility of life, in some form, in other parts of the universe. My argument is that current data suggests that complex life is probably extraordinarily rare given the known requirements for it.
- *yawnuncle_helv
- Flagellum/Teleos is soooo 2007. Your fifteen minutes are up pal, sell it somewhere else.TheBlueOne
- pisseth offeth, or somethingeth..thy cunteth!vrmbr
- hahahah...
mikotondria3
- kinetic0
i was listening to the teleconference on their site. it was really disorganized and there were people pushing the buttons on the phone.
a woman says "thank you everyone, the question portion of this conference is over i hope you enjoy (something)....."
and this guy comes on yelling and says "hey!! HEEEYYY!! I WANT TO ASK YOU GUYS ABOUT THAT BIG VAGINA YOU'RE FLYIN' AROUND!!!"
hahaha.
this blog recaps some of the details:
http://blog.wired.com/wiredscien…
- ernexbcn0
NASA's press release talks about an object, that they were looking for the past 50 years.
Well, in about 4 hours and 30 mins we'll know
- Corvo0
Where did you quote this from, Drno?
- harlequino0
Feels relevant.
http://www2.b3ta.com/hawking/
- max_prophet0
- might be, some people speculates that nasa found dark matterernexbcn
- they did! two years ago! http://www.nasa.gov/…neverblink
- then it has to be Elvisernexbcn
- ideal0
water......
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov…
- Corvo0
That would be exciting indeed, but how could a solar system be a solar system if it had a black-hole in it's midst? How would planets and bodies in the limits of the solar system be dependent from the star? It wouldn't be a solar system, innit? Unless they're announcing it's not a solar system, which would pretty much bamboozle the hell out of everything it's known so far. I'm more prone to believe it's something about Pluto and the limits of the solar system itself. NASA was pretty pissed about the fact that ESA announced Pluto was not a real planet, but a large sun-dependant asteroid given it's size.
On the other hand, having found "something" that could explain why the known orbits suffer gravitational deviations and are not circumferential, but an ellipse - that could be something. Still, it's pretty inconceivable it's a black-hole. No spaceship trajectory (to Mars or Saturn) in the solar system could ever have been calculated if there was such an unknown gravitational-pull as such that comes from a black-hole (or that which is by definition the pull from an unknown black-hole).
- A black hole at the center of the GALAXY, not the SOLAR SYTEM. If it was in the Solar System we'd be dead a loooong time agoTheBlueOne
- creative-0
I heard Microsoft had purchased the Moon which means in a couple of days it will grind to a halt, eventually crashing into the Earth.
- detritus0
It's not my 'error', it's a logical interpretation of the happenstance of your only popping up in these sorts of threads. And Lo, "'first' error"! - hark at the innately arrogant implication that I am, by default, wrong!
I'd, of course, agree with your argument about complex life being extraordinarily rare - such assertions are nothing new, and nothing outwith current scientific thought.
But it's the subtext to "seems that the most current data has turned the dated "copernican principle" on it's head." that I question - your insinuation being that the data we have access to now is the sum total of what we should expect and that it shouldn't point to anything other than this being the case.
We are nothing special. We are a moderately unlikely statistical event in a mind-bogglingly large universe. Our beliefs, religious or otherwise, are irrelevant to these questions whilst we poke around in the dark.
Anyway, there's nothing said here that hasn't been said here a hundred times before, so I bid you adieu (after reading your inevitable reply, of course).
- TheBlueOne0
Just Say No To Deep Religious/Philosophical Debates on QBN 2008. I declare a moratorium. Who's in?
- good call TheBlueKnee, i second!7point34
- haha hope you're feeling well by the way.. good drugs?7point34
- Trying to limit the vicodin intake...just handfulls of advil...TheBlueOne
- how long til rehab and up and walking again?7point34
- Rehab next week..probably walking somewhat normally in two weeks time. Sports? 7 months.TheBlueOne
- cage fighting anytime soon? hahaha feel better dude7point34
- jkmohr0
i'm listening to the live stream. great music.