Public Voice Network
- 23K 1616
- another logo 3030
- Canon 5D Mark II 1717
- 5th September 55
- olympics logo 1313
- blog 2462024620
- Show some old work 1111
- slightly worrying? 2121
- type question 2323
- Grooverider-4 years priso… 7171
- cant remember this move: 11
- 2 karagarga invites for a… 33
- time machine on a mac 22
- Examples of Dynamic Flash 44
- Camera icons 22
- there should only be 4 th… 2929
- 70's designs 55
- Timmmaaayyy 77
- Design concept 3030
- Politics 119119
- gary 3737
- Coin Toss UK 2525
- Font 1414
- Show some recent work 813813
logo critique 1515 Responses
Last post: 5 months, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: Mar 12, 08, 10:55 a.m.
- Jnr_Madison
The irony of the username.


- Dog-earMar 12, 08, 10:56 a.m. – Permalink
- Jnr_Madison
Downplay it or make it ilegible?


- Dog-earMar 12, 08, 11 a.m. – Permalink
- designerror
is it a gender bender dress shop or a mans car tuneup shop?


- Dog-earMar 12, 08, 11 a.m. – Permalink
- detritus
I like the leftside simpler versions more... but feel that the wings are a little limp & lifeless and don't integrate as well as they could with the wordmark. Also, and I appreciate the downplay background, i think 'specialties' is too small.
Might be really tacky - but have you tried angling or perspectifying it at all? just imbue a bit more motion or dynamism in or something - it just feels a little too clean and simple.
Or maybe that's a good thing. I have, once or twice in my life, been wrong.


- Dog-earMar 12, 08, 11:01 a.m. – Permalink
- dirtydesign
The blue is little soft for a racing product.
The type and wing graphic is too edgy for a gender bender shop.

- Dog-earMar 12, 08, 11:08 a.m. – Permalink


