Public Voice Network
- Invention
- looking for this kind of … 1414
- Why are hackers always ah… 1919
- blog 3028230282
- Ignore button please. 3232
- Mirror's Edge = vomit… 2424
- Your latest DESIGN purcha… 203203
- What does the future hold… 99
- ripping videos from sites 77
- best way to determine you… 1717
- Hen Party... 4141
- Your latest print purchas… 77
- trim/shave 88
- Happy VI Day
- skulls 5050
- Pic of the Day 1019410194
- water marks on letterhead… 44
- QBN Spam Report 2121
- serif fonts 1616
- Why, why, why? 1010
- FMT 112108 3232
- party @ simonyi's 33
- Vid of the Day 151151
- FFFind me a FFFound 44
Fish Eye Lens for Canon 4040 Responses
Last post: 6 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Mar 6, 08, 10:27 a.m.
- Meeklo
Tokina AT-X 107 DX 10mm-17mm
http://www.amazon.com/Tokina-10m…
VSSigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6
http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-10-2…- Mar 6, 08, 10:27 a.m. – Permalink
- capn_ron
perfect thread for a quick question.
I am about to purchase a EOS 40D kit. I found the kit with two options for lenses. Option on is the EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM for $1664.95. Option 2 is the EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM for $1329.95. It option 1 really that much better of a lens? Or should I just buy the body and get a lens separate?

- Dog-earMar 6, 08, 10:55 a.m. – Permalink
- tile
I have a sigma 10:20 for a few weeks now and it hasn't really come off ever since ... I have a nikon d40x which means the auto-focus motor is in the lens. This makes it a bit bulkier and with the standard flash you get an shadow on the bottom of your pics...
some examples:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tim…

- Dog-earMar 6, 08, 12:55 p.m. – Permalink



