Public Voice Network
- Let's go on a date wi… 1010
- Why are hackers always ah… 2121
- Blackberry Storm Line 1212
- blog 3028330283
- Official 2008-09 NHL Thre… 107107
- looking for this kind of … 1515
- Mirror's Edge = vomit… 2525
- serif fonts 1717
- Invention
- Ignore button please. 3232
- Your latest DESIGN purcha… 203203
- What does the future hold… 99
- ripping videos from sites 77
- best way to determine you… 1717
- Hen Party... 4141
- Your latest print purchas… 77
- trim/shave 88
- Happy VI Day
- skulls 5050
- Pic of the Day 1019410194
- water marks on letterhead… 44
- QBN Spam Report 2121
- Why, why, why? 1010
- FMT 112108 3232
layout crit 4444 Responses
Last post: 8 months, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: Mar 5, 08, 8:26 a.m.
- doesnotexist
2nd one looks way cleaner


- Dog-earMar 5, 08, 8:30 a.m. – Permalink
- neverblink
1. is younger
2. is more 'business'
- Dog-earMar 5, 08, 8:31 a.m. – Permalink
- JesusChrist
#1
it is the word of the lord

- Dog-earMar 5, 08, 8:32 a.m. – Permalink
- monkeyshine
Maybe it is just me but #1 looks a bit like a Disney site...or a site directed at 14 year olds. I think it's the color choice and the typeface is weak.
From a prospective student perspective, nothing about this speaks to cutting edge or technologically saavy.


- Dog-earMar 5, 08, 9:30 a.m. – Permalink
- JerseyRaindog
I prefer the colours of 1 but the layout of 2. Though I find both a little all over the place. Like a lot of websites I'm not sure where you want me to read first. There's no 'hook' and I'm left looking at a bunch of buttons...
Oh god, I sound like some kind of client.


- Dog-earMar 5, 08, 9:34 a.m. – Permalink



