Public Voice Network
- Mirror's Edge = vomit… 2525
- serif fonts 1717
- Invention
- looking for this kind of … 1414
- Why are hackers always ah… 1919
- blog 3028230282
- Ignore button please. 3232
- Your latest DESIGN purcha… 203203
- What does the future hold… 99
- ripping videos from sites 77
- best way to determine you… 1717
- Hen Party... 4141
- Your latest print purchas… 77
- trim/shave 88
- Happy VI Day
- skulls 5050
- Pic of the Day 1019410194
- water marks on letterhead… 44
- QBN Spam Report 2121
- Why, why, why? 1010
- FMT 112108 3232
- party @ simonyi's 33
- Vid of the Day 151151
- FFFind me a FFFound 44
nin ghosts 3232 Responses
Last post: 7 months ago | Thread started: Mar 3, 08, 10:04 a.m.
- co2
"The end result is a wildly varied body of music that we're able to present to the world in ways the confines of a major record label would never have allowed". I'm thinking this means that he can put out whatever he wants: good stuff or complete shite. At least the price ($5) reflects the chance you are taking. The photography looks sharp.


- Dog-earMar 3, 08, 10:59 a.m. – Permalink
- blaw
I paid $5 for the Saul Williams release (worth it) and I'll pay the $10 for this.
If for no other reason than I have a chance to use my money to break the current music-for-sale business model. The recording industry is in a position to restructure or die, but instead choose to use the RIAA as some kind of bully organization to sue college kids.
I still spend a lot on music annually, but I'm definitely looking to put more in the artist's pocket and less in the account of a business exec.


- Dog-earMar 3, 08, 1:02 p.m. – Permalink

