Skip to main content

should I sign this agreement? 2222 Responses

Last post: 9 months, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: Jan 30, 08, 8:30 a.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

  • Randd

    A. Contractor was hired by Company to develop corporate identity package including logo, wine hierarchy elements, hangtags, hangtag wine “journal”, store signage and associated promotional and collateral materials (collectively the “Work”), and may be an author or co-author of the Work as defined by the copyright laws of the United States.
    B. Company desires to be the sole owner of all rights, including copyrights, in the Work and
    acquire any such rights which Contractor may have.
    In consideration of the above recitals and the promises set forth in this agreement and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
    1. The Work is deemed a work made for hire and all right, title and interest that Contractor has or might have in and to the Work vests immediately in Company upon creation of the Work. In the event that the Work is not deemed by law to be a work for hire, Contractor hereby sells, assigns and transfers to Company all right, title and interest in the Work, including rights defined by the copyright laws in the United States and throughout the world. Company has for its own use, and for its successors and assigns, all rights in the Work that Contractor may have held had this assignment and sale not been made.
    2. Contractor warrants that the Work, as submitted by Contractor to Company, is original and does not violate any copyright, trademark, patent, proprietary or statutory right of any other person.
    3. Contractor waives all rights to the Work, including without limitation, any and all rights of
    identification of authorship and any and all rights of approval, restriction or limitation or use or subsequent modifications.

    However, Contractor may use the completed Work Product and any preliminary designs for the purpose of promoting their business, for example design competitions, future publications on design, educational purposes, marketing materials, and portfolio. In these cases, for a period of one year, Contractor will obtain permission from Company before utilizing Work Product. Thereafter, Contractor has full use of Work Product
    for the sole purpose of promoting their business. The parties have executed this agreement as of the date first written above.

    Jan 30, 08, 8:30 a.m. – Permalink
  • jamble

    Seems reasonable enough. Is that all there is to the agreement?

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 8:42 a.m. – Permalink
  • Studiospooky

    Yeah I thought it seemed about reasonable enough as long as you're incorporating any buyout fees for creative properties into your cost... I have to confess I didn't read it all though Randd. It came at me like a whole heap of words. I got scared and went and did some work instead.

    • << What he said. As long as the buyout fees are included..it sounds ok to me if you don't mind selling all rights to the work.sintaxera1/2
      there is no mention of payment? id aim to get the agreement to be valid on FULL and final paymentondo2/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 8:44 a.m. – Permalink
  • neue75_bold

    as your long time friend, advisor and trusted confident, I'd say maybe...

    • but maybe not?neue75_bold1/3
      Haha... "As your attorney, I advise you to rent a very fast car with no top..."Mimio2/3
      Sounds like the Neutral people on futurama ... my gut feeling says maybejamble3/3
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 8:46 a.m. – Permalink
  • Studiospooky

    Yeah, what neue75_Bold said.
    I mean... don't trust what he said.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 8:47 a.m. – Permalink
  • neue75_bold

    what point size was this set in?

    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 8:49 a.m. – Permalink
  • duckofrubber

    All seems fine and reasonable to me, as long as you've charged accordingly for the loss of your rights. This is pretty standard for Work for Hire. The only tricky part, really, is the need to ask permission for the first year if you use any of the work for self-promotional purposes. Make sure that you will get that permission, and I will say that you are OK.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 8:49 a.m. – Permalink
  • Randd

    yes, I was going to ixnay the period of one year permission part.

    I'm willing to say it's work for hire, as long as I can put it in my portfolio as work I've done, but what do you think of this part:

    "In the event that the Work is not deemed by law to be a work for hire, Contractor hereby sells, assigns and transfers to Company all right, title and interest in the Work, including rights defined by the copyright laws in the United States and throughout the world." is that ok?

    • frankly, it's not that great anyway, so it's all probably mootRandd1/3
      * nods head, puffs moot...neue75_bold2/3
      mutes nod, puffs headRandd3/3
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 8:55 a.m. – Permalink
  • StratusGD

    I think that's ok. Going to try to check with a lawyer friend, but I'm pretty sure that they're just covering their asses and saying that, should there be a condition or a local law somewhere that classifies the work you're doing as something other than 'Work for Hire', they do, in fact, own the work.

    • many thanks, allRandd
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 9 a.m. – Permalink
  • Jaline

    You can tell me what's really going on.

    Is this about your soul?

    • that's long goneRandd
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 9:09 a.m. – Permalink
  • duckofrubber

    "In the event that the Work is not deemed by law to be a work for hire, Contractor hereby sells, assigns and transfers to Company all right, title and interest in the Work, including rights defined by the copyright laws in the United States and throughout the world." is that ok?

    This is just saying that if, by chance, it's not Work for Hire, then you assign all your rights JUST LIKE it were Work for Hire. Just a way to say that they get all rights regardless of Work for Hire laws wherever you live.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 9:56 a.m. – Permalink
  • duckofrubber

    oh sorry, didn't read StratusGD's answer.

    Um, yeah, what he said...

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 9:57 a.m. – Permalink
  • _salisae_

    replace 'contractor' with 'shari eaton' and sign. That is my expert advice.

    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 10:07 p.m. – Permalink
  • univers

    i find it weird they want sole rights of artwork. leaving you nothing but the right to display it in your portfolio? am i missing something?

    • it's their logo, and they want to franchiseRandd
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 30, 08, 11:54 p.m. – Permalink
  • ComicSans_Rocks

    This is actually a pretty reasonable contract, it is obvious that you have not received a "the standard contract" given by most interactive or ad agency basically stating that they own all intellectual property rights and usage of your work and that you are only entitled to a pay check for the work. If you disclose, and or share any intellectual property with any third parties of work that you have created for them, that you would be sued and liable for all damages, violation of a sign contract and court cost which vary state from state. And there usually stipulation that all of your ideas, thoughts, concepts, etc.. created in the workplace was sole property of the agency. At least you get a potential portfolio piece, consider this generous by the agency...

    • it's not an agency... it's a client. I'm the "agency"Randd
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 31, 08, 12:31 a.m. – Permalink
  • univers

    so this is an assignment.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 31, 08, 12:35 a.m. – Permalink
  • letters2

    Logo/identity work can NOT be work for hire – below are the types of work that can be considered for a work for hire agreement.

    (1) a translation, (2) a contribution to a motion picture or other audiovisual work, (3) a contribution to a collective work, (4) as an atlas, (5) as a compilation, (6) as an instructional text, (7) as a test, (8) as answer material for a test, (9) or a supplementary work.

    If you want to sign over to them all rights to your work (including ideas, sketches, things you designed that they didnt use, etc.) then you should have a document that is signed by both parties doing so – in which case the kind of vague, cover-all language above would do something to that effect.

    But I don't like it. there are clauses that are not reasonable. Like only being able to show the work you made for self-PR purposes, with permission from the client for up to one year (and not after). That seems a little excessive even without knowing the exact nature of the work.

    In any event, if you choose to transfer rights to your work over to the client (which I would suggest doing only with the final/end product/design) then I would suggest you GET PAID for the rights. Its rather standard practice in this case to have a fee for the work and a separate fee for the selling and transfer of rights to the work unto the client.

    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 31, 08, 12:41 a.m. – Permalink
  • letters2

    So I think no, don't sign it! Hoping you didnt't…

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 31, 08, 9:05 a.m. – Permalink
  • Randd

    to clairfy: the work is a logo, some symbols and a little collateral I did for a wine retailer. They want to expand and franchise. It seems reasonable that they want ownership of their logo--why would they want someone else to have their logo? I just want to retain some authorship to show in my portfolio, etc

    • i.e. on approximately one half of one per cent of my websiteRandd
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 31, 08, 9:42 a.m. – Permalink
  • emokid

    you have my blessing to sign

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 31, 08, 9:59 a.m. – Permalink
  • Studiospooky

    Haven't you signed that yet Randd?
    Damn, I'm faxing my signature to your client RIGHT NOW...

    dg-dg-dg-brrrrrrrrrr-bp-bp-bbbbp…
    (fax machine sound effect)

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJan 31, 08, 10:01 a.m. – Permalink

Login or Register to respond to this

Skip to main content