Logo Crit
- Started
- Last post
- 8 Responses
- detritus0
First one, because the S is much more legible as a letterform.
I think you could fit in the strapline a bit better and wonder whether you should increase the height of the initial S and maybe expand the top of the form to match the curves in the rest of your lettering.
Also, and I guess you're still mocking up, the curves feel like they could use a little work- the inner tail could fit better and the major tail gets a bit scrappy towards the ends.
Have you tried it with the 'upport' in the same text size as 'uffield'? - given that it is quite a curvy and loose form, I wonder whether the hard right justification is a bit artificial?
- bulletfactory0
if the uffield upport were the same size the rag may mimic the S shapes - may be worth exploring
- radar0
I agree with #1 - but more refinement the S form can definitely be tightened & better defined.
I also agree with getting both words the same font size - being so close together in size but not quite the same makes me uneasy
- max_prophet0
utterly meaningless, insipid, namby pamby rubbish. Looks more like a nursing home - nothing in this logo suggests 'living life to the fullest'
- detritus0
Mm, maybe not stated quite so emphatically as max_prophet, but my opinion is that this logo would be more suited towards some sort of hazily stated feminine hygiene product.
Sorry :(
Get some colour in there..
..make it pop.
hehe
- Witt0
don't make the mark merge with the logotype (the text), because then you won't be able to use them separately.
- waynepixel0
I like the first one, but I am not to sure it reads very well.
Both good work.
- chossy0
the second one without the crown of learning :)