Public Voice Network
- Pic of the Day 1019010190
- Fuck this, I'm 22
- Why, why, why? 88
- What are you listening to… 890890
- skulls 4545
- FMT 112108 3030
- Volume One 1212
- blog 3026530265
- thread killer 22022202
- Ignore button please. 2424
- New Bond "Quantum of… 7272
- For a better tomorrow 1919
- EC: Joe Wigdahl 2626
- Dream Cars Videos 99
- Wanda Sykes munches rug 2929
- Batesoling was fun 1010
- No Vocode 2525
- Canned Food Drive 22
- Australia! 2424
- Baby P's Parents/Kill… 5959
- Friday, fuck yeah 99
- the painful truth... 66
- ODB Interview 33
- How much % of visitors to… 2828
Shepard Fairey 1717 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 1 month ago | Thread started: Sep 24, 07, 5:55 a.m.
- leanmean
At least he admits it was a inside joke as to how the Andre campaign started. He didn't make up a bullshit reason for it after the fact.
You can say what you want about him, he does produce a consistent amount of work with quality. Nothing ever look half ass.


- Dog-earSep 24, 07, 8:49 a.m. – Permalink
- Meeklo
At least he admits it was a inside joke as to how the Andre campaign started. He didn't make up a bullshit reason for it after the fact.
leanmean
(Sep 24 07, 08:49)I think we all know about being an inside joke, because thats how he explained how it happens some years ago, why would he change the story now, after telling it is so many books, magazines, interviews, etc..?


- Dog-earSep 24, 07, 8:58 a.m. – Permalink
- Ampersanderson
it's good to hear him talk about it as originally an accident. anything can seem deep and inspired after attributing to it words like "phenomonology"


- Dog-earSep 24, 07, 9:06 a.m. – Permalink
- Ampersanderson
is there a YouTube presentation of QBN.com?


- Dog-earSep 24, 07, 9:07 a.m. – Permalink
- acescence
well it's interesting that he now explains it as an accident, but when he was really pushing it while at risd he would hand out a piece of paper that would explain it as an experiment in phenomenology. his aim was to make it a ubiquitous symbol that had no meaning, so people would assign their own meaning to it.


- Dog-earSep 24, 07, 9:29 a.m. – Permalink
- Meeklo
well it's interesting that he now explains it as an accident, but when he was really pushing it while at risd he would hand out a piece of paper that would explain it as an experiment in phenomenology. his aim was to make it a ubiquitous symbol that had no meaning, so people would assign their own meaning to it.
acescence
(Sep 24 07, 09:29)I have never heard that version.
But I can see that as a result of the accident..did he denied it was an accident then?


- Dog-earSep 24, 07, 9:34 a.m. – Permalink


