Holy sh*t! Image Resize
- Started
- Last post
- 42 Responses
- ephix0
we're all gonna lose our jobs soon
run for the hills!
- canuck0
Thank you for your attention !!!
- rafalski0
The Hollywood way: let's not pay for the script, it'll be cheaper to get the author on payroll
http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/0…
- bolus0
haha, the internet is one big lamp, we all rubbed it, and in no time this technology will be integrated in photoshop....
- rafalski0
..and we won't get fired, just be paid to oversee the machines work!
Anyway, adobe has a hell of a job finding new features for photoshop. I mean, what doesn't it do yet?
- bolus0
it doesn't easily help me get my negatives inverted properly....
- Jaline0
Photoshop will be bigger than Adobe if it gets this. Or maybe it already is their largest program?
- Jaline0
...yeah, it probably is
- bolus0
pmub
- madirish0
Photoshop will be bigger than Adobe if it gets this.
Jaline
(Aug 29 07, 05:34)um..... what am i missing here? did you mean for:
*Adobe = Acrobat?:)
- Jaline0
nope, I meant that Adobe will be overshadowed by its own product.
- Jaline0
aaah, raf, that's so cool. thanks for the link :)
- rafalski0
it's crazy how fast people react to new ideas, I'm amazed with the proliferation of iphone apps
- zombiewoof0
Wait a minute folks...yes this is very cool use of interpolation technology and all. but something isn't right here. I agree with
an earlier poster who said "hands of my images" Many of us are also photographers and respect the true nature of a shot. This blows that out of the water. You know that icky feeling you get when you see an image scaled amorphically...well now your gonna start getting all sorts of hacks modifying images faster than you can say Kai's Power Tools, and not be able to tell as quickly... Yes for quick production comps this cool, it will save some time, but I'd rather reshoot the photo to preserve integrity...*sweeps up little bits of integrity offa the floor and walks away muttering ...
- Geith0
if I was that guy, I would have SOLD it Adobe rather than take a job. he would have been WAY better off.
- Sickman0
if I was that guy, I would have SOLD it Adobe rather than take a job. he would have been WAY better off.
Geith
(Aug 31 07, 09:41)i was thinking the same thing - but who knows what really is going on there
- rafalski0
if I was that guy, I would have SOLD it Adobe rather than take a job. he would have been WAY better off.
Geith
(Aug 31 07, 09:41)i was thinking the same thing - but who knows what really is going on there
Sickman
(Aug 31 07, 09:46)The Hollywood way: let's not pay for the script, it'll be cheaper to get the author on payroll
www.techcrunch.com/200...
rafalski
(Aug 29 07, 01:12)..and they'll own anything he does
- rafalski0
Boohaa
http://rsizr.com/
- Jaline0
nice!