Darwinist
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- mrdobolina0
I expect to see "The War on Darwin" on the cable news channels this time next year. Similar to "The War on Terror" that we see now.
- Nairn0
'my' salient points?
You going to cut off the cover of the current issue and hang it on your wall, kuz?
;)
- flagellum0
All of those, Tick(le).
You have actively researching:
Biochemists
Astronomers
Biologists
Physicistsetc... etc...
Your arguments from ignorance aren't doing much for um... whatever your cause is.
- mrdobolina0
I doubt you have many friends that disagree with you, Discipler.
Having a one-track mind and a defective turntable and all.
- skt0
K0na you're missing the point! the male model issue, merely proposes that after the reduction of our environmental challenges evolution is currently being reversed. Really man, get with hte programme!
kelpie
(Jan 5 06, 07:48)Thats a very good point kelpie. Did you know they even let disabled people mate these days? We are all doomed.
- TheTick0
balboa,
well said. I find myself silly continuing to respond to this charlatan and huckster of simple-mindedness. And the last thing I want to do is help this peddler of quackery evolve to a higher rhetorical plane. I bow out knowing I have won the war, the battle and the women.
Flagellator is like Baghdad Bob - "Even now we are killing Americans by the thousands!"
Um, yeah. OK. You can call the sky green all day, ain't going to make it so.
- JazX0
hey discipler, I've lost that really interesting page on how that young petrified tree was found in strata that is believed to be dated much older than the tree itself. interesting read and improbable under current evolutionary geologic beliefs.. man I want that story for interest alone
- KuzIII0
cheeky munky! i'm well smart... as well you know!
- mrdobolina0
Discipler, I have asked you this before and you never answered.
Were you interested in ID before you were born-again?
- flagellum0
You can get the background of just some of the high profile ID proponents here:
- balboa0
Conflating ID with Punk Rock.
That's a regretful line you just crossed, my unevolved friend.
;)
- KuzII0
actually that is not scientific fact that you just said, dickpler, a small group of pseudo-scientists with deeply held religious beliefs are pushing really hard to get such views accepted. the truth is, the overwhelming number of mainstream scientific journals, insititutions college campuses etc... new scientist, scientific american etc... and the wider scientific commuunity, wholeheartedly reject ID. You chose to cling on to it cos of your religious beliefs. We all know it.
- flagellum0
Tick, ID cannot answer the age of the earth and doesn't try to.
Tick, ID cannot answer the age of the earth and doesn't try to.
Tick, ID cannot answer the age of the earth and doesn't try to.
lol
- Mimio0
They need to get their theory/model straight. That's a really fundamental disagreement.
- KuzIII0
evolution of the flagella
- JazX0
Misconception: Evolution is a theory about the origin of life.
Evolutionary theory deals mainly with how life changed after its origin. Science does try to investigate how life started (e.g., whether or not it happened near a deep-sea vent, which organic molecules came first, etc.), but these considerations are not the central focus of evolutionary theory. Regardless of how life started, afterwards it branched and diversified, and most studies of evolution are focused on those processes.
- JazX0
+50 for JazX today..
This is the first time Ive ever seen the Huttons Law Of Uniformitarianism mentioned on a design forum.
Splendid.JazX IS Uniformitarianism Sans Extended Bold Oblique
mikotondria2
(Jan 5 06, 10:58)WOOT WOOT!! They're my Homeslices...
:D
- JazX0
more honest, you say. personally, from what I know of the fossil record and the education that I received, I would side more on the side of Evolutionary Theory, however, that doesn't mean, and I can say this, without taking an absolutist viewpoint, ID raises some good questions and those questions should be given their proper due. Religious agenda pushing aside.
- flagellum0
hehe, Tick. You've succeeded in dodging the actual hard science again and simply quoting and linking old data which you haven't done any comparative study about.
Enjoy the spoils of... emm... victory!