Tell me.
- Started
- Last post
- 34 Responses
- robotron3k
I want to know.
- JazX0
want to know what? how cool I am?
- chossy0
ok if you must know once but I didn't like it
- Dita_kz0
you told me it was twice chossy!!!
- jg_20
santa claws does not exist
- -leah-0
dita what does chossy look like? is he perfect? imaculate? cause thats what he's sayin
- rasko40
when I was a kid I let my parents pay for an expensive anti-woodworm fumigation treatment for our entire house, not letting on that I had just been bored throwing darts at the skirting boards, doors etc.. shhhh!!
- tomkat0
my host just killed my database.
- chossy0
yeah dita I did but I liked the second time. I'm naughty, but not like the bloody profligate rasko4
- gruntt0
i already told you once. i'm afraid i can not repeat it.
- _salisae_0
rasko rasko rasko, what happened to you as a child? stealing from your mom's purse and now this?!
- mg330
I think Robotron was asking:
What do Creation Scientists Believe?Scientists who call themselves "creation scientists" are professionals, typically with advanced degrees from major universities, who are generally involved in the same types of work as the average scientist. The difference is that creation scientists have a "world-view", or "model" for their science which is based on the belief that an intelligent designer ("God") exists who created our universe and the natural things in it. The creation events were one-time events and are not taking place today. A large subset of creation scientists could be called "Biblical creationists", who take the first eleven chapters of the Bible to be real history, including the creation of all things in six 24-hour days, the existence of Adam and Eve as the first man and woman, the unnatural introduction of "death" into the perfect creation because of the disobedience of Adam and Eve, and the occurence of a world-wide flood (Noah's flood) which destroyed most life and greatly affected the processes operating on the earth. Most creation scientists believe that the earth is "young" (on the order of ten thousand years), but this is a secondary issue. Biblical creationists believe that the Bible and true science are in full harmony with each other - there is no need to "check your brain at the door" when entering a church.
A major goal of creation science is to point out the weakness of evolutionary theory, because basically there are only two alternatives for how we got here, and if naturalistic processes are incapable of the task, then special creation must be the correct answer. On the positive side, creation scientists are developing alternative models and theories in many areas to help our understanding of how the universe works. It should be noted that much of day to day scientific activity is not heavily influenced by either evolutionary or creation assumptions, but much scientific energy has been wasted over the last century in the search for evolutionary evidences and experimental proofs, which have been unsuccessful so far and will continue to be. How much further might we be in some areas of scientific understanding if a model of special creation had been the working hypothesis?
- Rand0
i had my teeth cleaned today
- tny0
genesis crashed
- StuBru0
I need a hug.
- GreedoLives0
somebody told me the other night that Mr T had died, but he's still alive...apparently.
Dunno, but that kinda upset me.
- Gorbie0
i'm so fucking high right now.
- StuBru0
I love you all.
- Rand0
I feel inclined to blow my mind
- effeuelle0
Taylor Rain is the queen of the world.