Dreamweaver 2004 Arrrrrrrrrr
- Started
- Last post
- 11 Responses
- waynepixel
Has anyone here used Dreamweaver 2004 with Mac OS X panther.
It runing like a bag of shite on my G4 400Mhz. Anyone have this problem.
- fues0
Same here, I went back to MX.
- waynepixel0
ya that where I am going now.
- Jnr_Madison0
Fine for me but on a pc.
- paulsmith0
I think Panther makes much bigger demands on your system, so DreamWeaver MX 2004 an already resouce hunger beast will struggle.
I have a Dual G5 so I wouldnt really know. :-) (Sorry to rub it in) ;-)
- 4cY0
why thank you paulsmith!
*looks up paulsmith's address, makes plans for breaking in*
;P
- paulsmith0
Hehe.
If I get robbed tomorrow I know where to look. ;-)
- unknown0
Dude, Macromedia MX 2004 studio in general is running like crap accross the platform. It is worse that photoshop and takes 3 times as long to start up flash or dreamweaver.
... .wtf
- unknown0
personally i love it (but i'm on a pc)
got mx to crash the day i was suppose to finish a client portfolio
so i reinstalled ultra dev (i don`t know if any of you remember that piece of crap)
took me like 4 hours to get back to work
anyways, to make my point, dw2004 is shit hot, once i installed it, everything just went straight hahead,
din't installed them on the macs here coz i prefer to code on win2k then test them on the stations
2004 all the way
- Cadillac0
All of Macromedia's apps since the Dreamweaver 4 era seem totally thrown together. Major resource hogging and lots of buggage. I have come to accept that Macromedia sucks mad ass and their products are all released prematurely.
Ask any Flash developer about bugs; they will tell ya.
Viva Homesite!
(Maybe it's time for the SVG revolution?)
- paulrand0
wow, from all the posts lately about dreamweaver, flash and freehand, I'm definitely not upgrading
- scarabin0
arrrrrr