For emecks
For emecks
Out of context: Reply #7
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- emecks0
thanks madeGB profusely.
couldn't that statement have been in the existing thread?
why a new one?
version3
(Mar 30 05, 05:57)possibly because the existing one was getting with pictures of version3's extended family??
####################
Indeed - why the very public hoop licking, in the form of a new thread?
skt
(Mar 30 05, 05:58)As soon as moondog waves her wand and de-piffs me again I'll think of a suitable answer, at the moment the thought of "hoop licking" is having a strange effect on me.