UFO of the day

Out of context: Reply #922

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,033 Responses
  • yuekit0

    Grusch should have just flown to the hearing in a UFO...that would have shut up the critics.

    As it is, zero evidence presented, not even a blurry photo. Just a guy we're told repeatedly has top-secret clearances and incredible levels of trustworthiness repeatedly claiming there are UFOs and interdimensional beings.

    • The hearing wasn’t about “here’s proof of aliens”, the hearing was about the gov covering up shit and us wanting answers and transparencyscarabin
    • Personally I would prioritize just getting the proof of aliens out there over the government bureaucracy problems.yuekit
    • And a protection system to be put in place for whistleblowersscarabin
    • I agree a big spectacle with aliens walking onstage and grusch driving up in a UFO would have been more entertaining, but this was never meant to be thatscarabin
    • We’re trying to get the gov to make some sort of disclosure of what it has, which could include the spectacles you describe. This was just a preliminary meetingscarabin
    • Right but what I'm saying is I don't think the government actually has 12 UFOs. You just have to look at Grusch's background, he's connected to a network ofyuekit
    • people who have been hyping this stuff for decades. Some are financially invested in it, have their own TV shows about UFOs and paranormal shit.yuekit
    • At no point have any of them produced a single shred of evidence. I can't believe how many are willing to ignore that -- also raises some serious questionsyuekit
    • And a lot of the witnesses don’t. We’re calling for investigation into the matter, not a cursory glance at one dudescarabin
    • about these politicians in Congress, whether there's some weird kind of corruption going on here or whether they're just really dumb.yuekit
    • “Weird kind of corruption” is definitely one of the main concerns. This was an oversight committee, remember? That’s what they doscarabin
    • And in terms of evidence, there’s apparently enough to go on to keep them busy for quite a whilescarabin
    • Hmmm is that hard to call in the Defense Secretary and ask him to tell them where the UFOs are?yuekit
    • This shouldn't actually be so difficult to figure out or consume so many resources. Remember we're paying these people lol.yuekit
    • Be patient, pop some popcorn, and let the whole drama unfold. It’s much more interesting than what color underwear Musk is wearing todayscarabin
    • From what I’ve seen the government isn’t showing or admitting a single thing. This is just whistleblowers answering to congress about what they speculatemonospaced
    • the government won’t let anyone investigate into something they truly don’t want investigated. This won’t lead to much in my opinionmonospaced
    • It's just a bunch of grifters and hoaxers
      https://www.theintri…
      yuekit
    • It could be! Either way, it’s important to have whistleblower protections, transparency, informed oversight, and a full understanding of the mountains of UAPscarabin
    • phenomena, so we can have a plan in case there actually is a threat to national security, or even worse. And what if there is NHI tech we can use ?scarabin
    • If there is I hope it gets incorporated into the iPhone 15.yuekit
    • Lol same. Honestly i don’t see us getting much in the way of disclosure, but what a trip it would be if we didscarabin
    • I want to believe but this reeks of a dude wanting attention. I know a guy who knows a guy who swears he saw a ufo and some ETs_niko
    • And the. Only name he’s given up is wait for it...Benito Mussolini lol_niko
    • Personally, i’m reserving judgement for entertainment purposes. Shit’s better than x-filesscarabin
    • lol Mulder would be proud_niko
    • I WANT to believe too. But so far, I see absolutely nothing that hasn't been easily debunked already, and nothing that even raises an eyebrow for evidence.monospaced
    • Testimony is considered evidence in our judicial system, and in Fravor’s case it was corroborated by multiple other people, radar data, AND videoscarabin
    • I guess it depends on what you consider “evidence”scarabin

View thread