FUCK ADOBE!
FUCK ADOBE!
Out of context: Reply #565
- Started
- Last post
- 718 Responses
- nb2
Boom!
“Make a spot color, call it the Pantone color you intend to print. This is what I have always done, printers don’t care, and IMHO the RGB screen values in Adobe products have never truly matched up to how the actual PMS color prints”
– Jessica Hische
- This won't work with the zillions of older files using Pantone swatches
You will need to change EVERY SINGLE FILEgrafician - Also good luck editing colors in highly detailed illustrations with 6-12 Pantone colors now all black...grafician
- Only the ones you want to editnb
- Pass the cost on to your clientsnb
- Filling in black is a dick move, but you’re the one who chose to use Adobe. You deserve at least some of the blamenb
- This thread is nine years old. You still using Photoshop? Who’s fault is thatnb
- @graf can’t you just pay the $21?nb
- it's the fucking principle, not the sum!grafician
- "The RGB screen values in Adobe products have never truly matched up to how the actual PMS color print"jonny_quest_lives
- Because Pantone provides those values... and Pantone was in the switchback selling business not the make Adobe look good businessjonny_quest_lives
- *Swatchbookjonny_quest_lives
- So two companies with no regard for helping the other out and Adobe transitioning away from print headaches as it's becoming an RGB screen worldjonny_quest_lives
- Print advertising budgets are abysmal so there's no growth market for Adobe there and specialty inks require bigger budgets and are limited topackagingjonny_quest_lives
- Everyone has shit dropped shipped via Amazon anyway so why put money into elaborate consumer facing productsjonny_quest_lives
- Fuck Pantone for making on screen display of files look like shit, penalizing is for using them at allmonospaced
- I get you can't select Pantone colors now, but will the Pantone colors in old documents disappear?jagara
- This won't work with the zillions of older files using Pantone swatches