9/11
9/11
Out of context: Reply #82
- Started
- Last post
- 114 Responses
- Hench-11
- Hi Setdmay
- That plane didn't have 5G tho.palimpsest
- ...... bUt STEel MEltS aT...aNd ThE FIre ChEf Said.. ANd whErE Are ThE WInGs.Morning_star
- I thought you guys moved on to sandy hook and bill gates chips in vaccines? you're still on about jet fuel can't melt steel beams? lolz_niko
- The conspiratorial woke._niko
- That looks like a paper aeroplane not a jumbo jet.PhanLo
- Good aim, pilot have done a direct impact on the grey car!OBBTKN
- @PhanLo but that house is smaller than one of them towers.palimpsest
- maybe pilot ditched the fuel instead of being fully loaded like the 911 jets_niko
- also what speed and angle was that plane coming in at? looks more like a free fall from above at low speeds that hit mostly the lawn_niko
- but thanks Hench for the apples to apples forensic comparison to 911, case closed._niko
- It's not about the how but the why.palimpsest
- Lol just read the article, the pilot lived which means that the hijackers also lived and the passengers were crisis actors all along, thanks hench!_niko
- As usual the brain dead zombies can only ridicule rather than putting forth a reasonable counter argument. They found the passports of the perps in the rubble.Hench
- If you believe that, I have been l news for you. You're a brain dead cunt.Hench
- Any of you brain dead zombies want to explain how the third building collapsed at free fall speed?Hench
- Didn't think so...Hench
- We have been pwned!palimpsest
- next ur gonna tell us birds aren't real, right?whatthefunk
- Yeesh. We can smell the crazy on you, Set.Continuity
- Where are the photos of the plane that hit the Pentagon?Chimp
- "As usual the brain dead zombies can only ridicule"
.Nairn - This one time, a small plane didn’t destroy small building. THATS ALL THE PROOF I NEED, BOYSnb