Circumcision

Out of context: Reply #207

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 226 Responses
  • imbecile1

    From 2001... Man Sues For Loss of Foreskin

    https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story…

    Given the choice, William Stowell says he would have kept his foreskin.

    Since the choice was made for him, he is suing the hospital where he was born and circumcised for depriving him of "the pleasure of natural, normal sexual intercourse."

    Stowell says his sex life would be much better if he had been allowed to keep his foreskin — the loose fold of skin that covers the tip of the penis. But his mother denied that to him when she signed a circumcision consent form in the maternity ward where she gave birth; she says now that it was a mistake.

    imbecile 1Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Hope he cashes in :)Gnash
    • Interesting, but who cares about plaintiffs. Headline might as well be "Man argues that money will somehow help him get over his circumcision"nb
    • This was settled privately over a decade ago.monospaced
    • If women were forced to undergo general mutilation to reduce pleasure under the guise of religion or cleanliness or some buklshit there would be riots_niko
    • Feminists would lose their shit and rightfully so. So why do we let boys suffer? Barbaric_niko
    • No evidence that it reduces pleasure. Mild health benefitsnb
    • Not true people who have been circumcised later in life report a great reduction in pleasure_niko
    • I certainly am not suffering. Neither are most circumcised men.monospaced
    • It’s a cultGnash
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread