News of the day...

Out of context: Reply #4001

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 4,823 Responses
  • yuekit7

    New technology leads to discovery of largest prehistoric structure ever found in Britain

    https://www.theguardian.com/scie…

    Four thousand five hundred years ago, the Neolithic peoples who constructed Stonehenge, a masterpiece of engineering, also dug a series of shafts aligned to form a circle spanning 1.2 miles (2km) in diameter.

    The structure appears to have been a boundary guiding people to a sacred area because Durrington Walls, one of Britain’s largest henge monuments, is located precisely at its centre.

    • Yass up the magic mushroom people!PhanLo
    • Submerged alien spacecraftyuekit
    • hard drugskingsteven
    • so Britons in 2000 bc could dig really big holes? no way!Gnash
    • A series of shafts is not a structure.monospaced
    • Seriously bunch of losers back then, dragging rocks around :)yuekit
    • And with Brexit in 2020, we're digging ourselves into an even bigger hole... of shit.shapesalad
    • The bigger take away being that researchers were surprised the britons could even count back thenGnash
    • I didn't know 'til recently that the stones at Stonehenge (etc) had Lego-like dimples and bumps in for securing:Nairn
    • https://www.theguard…Nairn
    • It’s not even a ‘shaft,’ it’s a pit/holeGnash
    • Cmon guys, you can read the article right?yuekit
    • "Shafts...each more than 5 metres deep and 10 metres in diameter. Approximately 20 have been found and there may have been more than 30."yuekit
    • The interesting part I guess is that it was a big enclosed area used for some sort of ritualyuekit
    • They only say Shafts’ because saying ‘we found a bunch of really big holes’ probably made the press release sound pretty lameGnash
    • lol @ holes vs. shafts debateyuekit
    • It’s only a debate in your head, even the guy writing the grant application knows it :)Gnash
    • You know I think you're right Gnash, hopefully we can get the word out to the public about this coverup.yuekit
    • Lol @ coverup. Some guys digging in the muck 4K years ago — that may, or may not, have learned to count — is not ‘news’.Gnash
    • It’s funny that it’s presented as such, and that people got excited by it. That’s all. No conspiracy. It’s not important enough, lol.Gnash
    • Hmmm I was under the impression Stonehenge and the other monuments were an impressive technical achievement for the time.yuekit
    • Honestly man I don't have a strong opinion on this topic, but you seem weirdly hostile towards ancient British people...yuekit
    • Hostile, lol. And who said anything about Stonehenge? If you think digging holes is laudable, awesome for youGnash
    • Any hostility you may detect is directed more at way these type of articles are written, and regurgitated by the mediaGnash
    • And then consequently shared as if it’s a big dealGnash
    • I mean yeah it seems kind of obvious no? This was surrounding Durrington Walls which is next to Stonehenge, part of the same religious site/ complex.yuekit
    • No one knows exactly who built it or how they did it. And holes or shafts positioned in a circle were probably not dug for the hell of it but perhaps remnantsyuekit
    • of some larger structure that didn't survive. At least that's what archeologists seem to think, but hey what do they know? :)yuekit

View thread