UFO of the day
UFO of the day
Out of context: Reply #552
- Started
- Last post
- 1,033 Responses
- Bluejam8
- yeah those!grafician
- hands down this is the most fascinating and frightening UFO evidence everinteliboy
- I wonder which country thats fromOP31
- US Navy south of border near San Diego I think. Rogan had the actual pilot on the podcast a few months backmoldero
- BelieveBennn
- could be some sort of particle, atmospheric 'bubble' that then looks like an object moving, or said thing causing optical illusion.shapesalad
- it was tracked on radar and numerous pilots saw with their own eyes Shape. Not to mention the US Navy and now the Pentagon saying it is 'unidentified'fadein11
- You have to wonder that if they're releasing this, what the fuck are they keeping back from the public.
'But i forgot my pen, shit the bed again'Morning_star - A taster for whats coming after coronadrgs
- moldero, Joe Rogan talked about the Pentagon release today as well. Morning_star, indeed. Something (i.e., news) is coming.MondoMorphic
- Corona 2 - Colonapocalypse, massive sky anusNairn
- The fact that it rotated was a bit more evidence than just a spot.dbloc
- The fact that it rotated is a confirmed example that the Bob Lazar propulsion system explanation is probably trueprophetone
- Nice, proof here : https://cloud10.todo…i_was
- yeah watching the tim pool ep nowmoldero
- #twoyearsoldwagshaft
- @wag not from the pentagon, was a whistleblower beforefadein11
- This debunks one of them
https://www.youtube.…atomholc - I have had two "Close Encounters of the First Kind" experiences in my lifetime. The last time was in 2016.utopian
- When I told people in the past they laughed at me. After these Navy UFO tapes surfaced 2018,...now they will not stop asking me questions about my encounter.utopian
- BTW - the video was not debunked by a non-scientific Youtuber.utopian
- this looks like something in very bad quality not like an ufo. hollywood can do better ufo's!api
- @utop, I would love to speak to you about that. And yep wasn't debunked at all.fadein11
- please share Utop!inteliboy
- What do you think of this explanation? https://www.youtube.…atomholc
- Not trying to day you didn't see aliens though ... just that maybe some of these things have an explanation.atomholc
- Kelly from skunk works already said we have the capabilities to go to the stars, but the tech is locked up in black projectsgrafician
- And I don't know what you mean about non-scientific you-tuber ... Keith has an academic background in science.atomholc
- This ain't no UFO; it's man-made. It's part of Trump's Space Force fleet.Krassy
- that explanation came before this was officially release video. Why would the US military doctor up footage of a UFO?inteliboy
- I love conspiracy videos but I love debunking videos even more. given both options here i'd tend to agree with that Mick West video_niko
- @niko I always try to find evidence to debunk conspiracy vids. However, Mick West's video counters with little to no scientific facts, he's just some YouTuber.utopian
- Mick is using the data from video to do the calculations? How is that not factual evidence?atomholc
- utopian, yeah I'm weary of that and any "expert" with a youtube channel, of course i can't verify the data and the screen readings are what he says, just giving_niko
- ...him the benefit of the doubt. But all things being equal, from what i've looked at so far, his is the most plausible explanation._niko
- Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack!pango - what does he explain? that some guy in the military sat there and used after effects to make a fake video? seriously.inteliboy
- no, the video's real, the pilot's interpretation of what they were seeing is wrong._niko
- https://i.gifer.com/…pango
- It/they were also tracked on radar and it behaved like no known aircraft.
https://en.m.wikiped…fadein11 - @atomholc - excellent vid, thanks!Nairn
- @utop - 'little to no scientific facts'? That entire video shows his working out. Not his fault we're too dumb to check his sums. Curious to know what you mean?Nairn
- Given Cunningham's Law, I'd expect his YT comments to be littered with counters if he was off-base.Nairn
- I find it surprising the Pentagon and US Navy wouldn't have ruled this out before releasing the videos, not to mention the testimony of the 'trained observer'fadein11
- pilots and radar data.fadein11
- Saying that it is only a small section of 1 of 3 videos being analysed.fadein11
- Have the Pentagon or US Navy even officially publicly commented on any of this?Nairn
- https://33.media.tum…pango
- @nairn
"The objects seen in three clips of declassified military footage are "unidentified aerial phenomena," Navy spokesperson Joe Gradisher confirmed to CNN."fadein11 - https://edition.cnn.…fadein11
- that was after the original leak by whistleblowerfadein11
- Well, there's nothing untrue in that statement. I'd suggest that the very fact we've seen these means they know what they are and discount anything too oddNairn
- Department of Defense this week.
"The US Department of Defense has released three declassified videos of "unexplained aerial phenomena".fadein11 - https://www.bbc.co.u…fadein11
- "The Pentagon said it wanted to "clear up any misconceptions by the public on whether or not the footage that has been circulating was real"."fadein11
- There is way more detail if you dig deeper. Many interviews with pilots and radar operators. More detail to both releases from US Navy and DoD as well.fadein11
- I watched a lot about this last year or whenever it was that Set was going on about it. There's just one vid now that seems as yet unexplainable to meNairn
- I just really liked the analysis of the guy in the aforelinked video, and even if I don't have the smarts to test his working, the example video of the runawayNairn
- balloon 'splained it in an obvious and ELI5 fashionNairn
- yep that video is good. I just don't understand why they would bother releasing stuff again after it was leaked if easily explained.fadein11
- surely they would just refer us to videos like that. The pilot interviews are pretty incredbile. These guys know what they saw.fadein11
- They were seeing things with their own eyes, not those grainy videos. And the radar operators who recorded the incredible speeds and movement.fadein11
- I don't think there was radar contact for the video explained above. There was for the Tic-Tac Nimitz group one.Nairn
- https://cdn.discorda…pango
- Like I said, all the info is out there, it's interesting if nothing else.
I guess some need El Presidente to confirm the phenomenon is real, Pentagon doesn'tfadein11 - cut it these days :)fadein11
- looks like QBN is divided into two camps, the Skullys and the Mulders, well three actually if you count the Peacocks but we don't talk about them._niko
- Ack ack ackpango
- lol _nikofadein11