Sagmeister Walsh

Out of context: Reply #150

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 171 Responses
  • ben_10

    people are entitled to their opinions, but it's not like NBQ and Robo haven't given a solid case to be called out on.

    I won't go to the extent fate has in terms of ⌘c ing people's comments, but the very first comments from these two took it to the "she must be successful because she got naked" place. I'm paraphrasing but you can go read it.

    Couple that sentiment with one of them practically running the cotd thread and the other one just trying to get noticed through blatant sexism because people are by and large ignoring his xenophobic trolling now, and you don't really get to a believable "it's just sarcasm" conclusion here, but maybe it's just boys being boys?

    Perhaps it's just locker room talk like Trump? except this isn't a locker room filled with a bunch of retarded jocks, it's a public website with an open forum where if you voice your opinion you can expect others to voice theirs.

    It's fair game to rip on a designer for their actual work, even if your comments are as inarticulate as "shit's trash" (that's what semi-anonymous forums are for after all.), but tearing a person down using common tropes based on their gender is kind of despicable and worth calling out.

    • though, it might be a locker room filled with retarded jocks.ben_
    • have you seen me? i'm more like a melted ice cream than jock.pango
    • Same boat man... Melting block of soft cheese.ben_
    • Don't you remember, Sagamiester &:Walsh post a nude pic every year to hustle work. We have less than a year to go for more nude designer pics.robotron3k
    • Your right robo! We need to think some something to stop them! Otherwise the children's are gonna get it! Think of them children!pango
    • for clarity, i say trash in that is vapid, disposable, useless, and will be forgotten. trash is just a buzz word atmimbecile
    • Here we go, that gender thingy again. SighNBQ00
    • My issue was with your insistence that she faked her way into owning a business through nudity or her sexuality, so yeah. "gender thingy".ben_
    • Never said she faked her way into owning a business through nudity. We were criticising her over-use of over-the-top narcisstic self-promo (and the nudity).NBQ00
    • And her misleading claims that she founded the agency instead of inheriting it. Without Sagmeister she wouldn't be where she is now. So why do you twist shit?NBQ00
    • We're not fucking sexists as you and fate accuse us of. I don't give a shit if she's a girl or a guy. We can't stand BS that's all.NBQ00
    • I'm not twisting anything. Go read your commentary again. But sure, you're not sexist, accept my apologies.ben_
    • she claimed she found the agency?pango
    • Let's all post nude selfies in the 2019 QBN Naked Hustle thread.wagshaft

View thread