Sagmeister Walsh
Sagmeister Walsh
Out of context: Reply #138
- Started
- Last post
- 171 Responses
- noneck4
I think fate and I are trying to point out how shitty and embarrassing the criticism in this thread is. After 17 years on here, I'm at the point where I either need to call out this shit when I see it, or not be a part of the community any longer.
I'm disappointed that there are calls to chill out and "not turn this into a SJW issue." I can't be quiet about this behaviour anymore.
- Bet you 100 Million, if Jessica was a guy this identity politics BS from you and fate wouldn't have arisen! Just because she's female you accuse us being sexistNBQ00
- agree but we're spinning in circle right now, the point has been made I think. We can continue for a week more, we will still be at the same place.Bennn
- I still think coming to the aid of a female shows how little you two think of Jessica. When you post a naked pic of yourself for business, it can be criticized.robotron3k
- I wasn't defending her. I was pointing out that critiques like "She only got the agency because tits" shouldn't have a place here.noneck
- I also pointed out that's impossible. She has no tits!pango
- Go ahead and point it out, that's your prerogative. But can you also lead by example and contribute with actual design talk?zarkonite
- However I'm with fate & noneck on this one. Even though the sexism is only on Schrodinger box LVL you can really blame other people for seein it as women hatingpango
- *cantpango
- It's a sad day when we can't discuss things openly. The dark cloud of cultural Marxism seems to be descended on QBN.youngdesigner
- The truth is that Jessica Walsh started all of this with her provocative images. She was basically inviting or asking for this kind of response.youngdesigner
- yes discuss things like how she got the position with her tits. which i can't mention enough, it's impossible.pango
- "cultural marxism" - lol, get over yourself, this is a discussion. no one's stopping you from voicing your opinion.ben_