capitalism

Out of context: Reply #258

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,317 Responses
  • deathboy-4

    deathboy -4Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • if anything discourse in the 80s was so much nicerdeathboy
    • Perhaps, because of less media/social media, to get to know someone you had to 'know' them, talk to them - and so people were more respectful towards strangers.shapesalad
    • @ 17 mins regarding the pencil. Lovely example.shapesalad
    • example of what?uan
    • This was before everyone gave up on arguing in good faith and started arguing to win/shut down the opponent.i_monk
    • something as simple as a pencil of free market. i hardly imagine the career politician to have any ideadeathboy
    • but this video is only part 1 of 10.... i think most people could really argue against anything in itdeathboy
    • #thermodynamicsmonospaced
    • #FindaTalkingPointTo...deathboy
    • mono if you want to wear the big boy pants like an adult you must make a valid argument. or just stay on sidelines of old toddlersdeathboy
    • well i guess you don't have too.... just don't expect to be treated as much by those that understand... but maybe thats the case. higher edu has killed reason.deathboy
    • all thats left is a angry dumb and selfish mob with no real principles triggered by any popular cause. perhaps we are approaching a dark agedeathboy
    • oh, I have no arguemnt... i never even watched the video ... I just like writing #thermodynamics everywhere you post anything politicalmonospaced
    • y'know, because the two aren't related, but you keep arguing they are (they aren't, really).monospaced
    • you are an idiot. go ahead and explain how the two are not related...i wish i could say shit and believe it as you dodeathboy
    • except I'm not an idiotmonospaced
    • Thermodynamics is a set of physical laws having to do with heat (energy). Politics does not have anything to do with heat in a system. Done. Fuck that was easy.monospaced
    • Cue another 20 incoherent notes from you attempting to make the connection, but failing miserably, and gaining even more downvotes in the process.monospaced
    • HAHA is economics devoid of energy? Hard to argue that one. Its simple minded to ignore hard science reaction with social systems and effectsdeathboy
    • can you explain why the thermodynamic concept of entrophy should be ignored to social economic structures? i only think you're an idiot because you dont cantdeathboy
    • even see the conversation. cant imagine or even humor it for a rational response. you simply seem to be missing the comprehension of it.deathboy
    • but its cool. if it was obvious to the masses or acceptable it would probably be fixed. Count yourself into the ignorant masses. You are the majority!deathboy
    • yes, it's 100% devoid of the energy described in the laws of thermodynamics ... that is my fucking pointmonospaced
    • if your'e going to REDEFINE what energy is completely , then sure, I guess you can apply your bullsh theory, but then it's not thermodynamics or entropy anymoremonospaced
    • your explanation only works if you don't use actual thermodynamic laws .. .AT ALL, and that's a fucking fact.monospaced
    • Clearly you read this somewhere on the internet and are trying to pass it off as deep thinking to overcome your OBVIOUS lack of education on the subjectmonospaced
    • Couple that with your ignorance of the corporate world and markets (you've made this clear), and I'm not surprised at your dumbass theories and conclusions.monospaced
    • cue the remaining 16 comments from you pathetically attempting to restate this nonsense while ignorantly trying to peg me as uninformedmonospaced
    • see i'd give you credit if u define your view of energy as a relation to my point. its simple thinking economies are devoid of energy.deathboy
    • look a smart fellow would look at this and say well we can rise above the nature or physics and counter entrophy. And display some sort of reasoning for it.deathboy
    • you have given 0 rational explanations too your conclusion thermoD rules are related to social economic systems. You are whiny brat that jsut criesdeathboy
    • loud fury and annoyance without any substance. im sure you don't think that, but try to picture it. a common place among thinkers is picturing and relating.deathboy
    • and honest thinkers if cant relate will say as much or ask a question. common among the secure emotional intellectual types. do you you have a question?deathboy
    • to confusion to any reasoning. so far all i get is you think thermodynamic energy in theory cant be economic energy. Id love to hear the reason for that.deathboy
    • well. i'd love to hear it but I don't expect it. im thinking basic reasoning of the such might be above your pay gradedeathboy
    • start basic and try to argue liquidity is not energy or a force? start somewhere for a base like an adult with a braindeathboy
    • try to be nice but some ppl are just stupid no matter how much you hand hold them i thinkdeathboy
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread