blog
blog
Out of context: Reply #67895
- Started
- Last post
- 75,602 Responses
- sea_sea1
Serious question.
How fkn hard is it to check the nsfw box before broadcasting?
Because now I'm seeing shitty photoshop dick on the cover and I didn't ask for it.
>: /- +pockets
- Don't hate dick, please.docpoz
- only thing i'm hating on is the lack of nsfw box checking abilities.sea_sea
- either way, thanks mods for handling it.
carry on.sea_sea - Yesterday I posted in the NSFW and QBNX threads wrongly assuming they were both marked NSFW. I'm sorry I offended you.soundofreason
- I have no use for the nsfw box because I don't post nsfw material outside those threads dedicated to it.soundofreason
- Art and genitalia go back a long way. We must keep qbn edgy and not neuter it, me thinks. That penis was awesome.docpoz
- Some see a shitty photoshop dick, some see a Futurist penis ("A nude never descends the stairs—a nude reclines").
To each their own.soundofreason - no, just check the fucking box dickhead.kingsteven
- What part of "I was wrong to assume I didn't need to check the box" & "I'm sorry" didn't you understand?soundofreason
- There is no need for name calling and foul language.soundofreason
- "we need to keep qbn edgy and not neuter it"kingsteven
- "I'm sorry I offended you" and defending why you posted it is totally fucking irrelevant mate. just apologise, move on. tick the box next time.kingsteven
- Ok, let's do this.
First part:
I wasn't defending why I posted it, I was explaining to sea_sea why I didn't check the nsfw box and apologized.soundofreason - Second part:
I was responding to docpoz about his comment "That penis was awesome" and comparing it to sea_sea's "shitty photoshop dick".soundofreason - I'm aware that any representation of genitalia is not welcome on the QBN front page. I even made a design related post in the NSFW thread because of this.soundofreason
- Now show me on the doll where you think I was defending my post?
I just wanted to let sea_sea and the rest of you know that it wasn't my intention to offend yousoundofreason - right, you realise NSFW stands for 'Not Safe For Work'. sea sea is simply stating that it was a shitty photoshopped dick that is NSFW...kingsteven
- OK, we're almost there.
I thought that the QBNX thread was marked nsfw, just like COTD and the NSFW thread.
...soundofreason - Meaning that all posts inside those threads are automatically marked nsfw.
That is the reason why I didn't think it was necessary to check the box.soundofreason - you didn't tick the box and inventing 'offence' in order to defer blame.kingsteven
- ^ that is what I was trying to say with
"Yesterday I posted in the NSFW and QBNX threads wrongly assuming they were both marked NSFW."soundofreason - Yes, I did NOT tick the box. Because I wrongly thought that the box did not need to be ticked.
I'm here for you kingsteven.soundofreason - Who did I defer the blame to? I thought apologizing was accepting blame.soundofreason
- Explaining why I did something wrong unintentionally is not denying it. I think it's better to let somebody know you didn't mean harm than a simple excuse.soundofreason
- you are sorry for 'offence' or 'nsfw threads' when no one is offended. you made a mistake by your own assumptions, you are totally in the wrong. tick the box.kingsteven
- This is why I'm taking the time to explain my message to you.soundofreason
- OK, I see that it's the offence you have a problem with. We'll get back to the box ticking later.
In your own words what was the harm? I'm not being sarcastic.soundofreason - What would you replace offence with? I acknowledge I did something wrong. Maybe it wasn't offensive. Would disrespect suit you?soundofreason
- any implication of harm is in your head and your inability to see this as more than a technical matter of ticking this box makes you look like a dickhead.kingsteven
- While we're at it. I am not sorry for 'nsfw threads', I did not create those threads. I don't see anything there's to be sorry about there.soundofreason
- is that clear enough?kingsteven
- * "inability to see this as just a technical matter"kingsteven
- It's clearly not clear enough. We'll skip the offence, harm, inconvenience,etc then.
Let's go back to the ticking the box.soundofreason - 1. When I made the post I did NOT tick the box.
2. The post made it to the front page.
3. sea_sea made a comment about it being on the front page.soundofreason - arrrrgh, you are insane mate. no one cares! i think i liked the pic in the thread... but don't want it on my feed as i look at qbn in work! tick the box.kingsteven
- 4. I explained to sea_sea why I had not ticked the box (because I thought the whole thread was marked nsfw).
5. I offered an apology for offending her.soundofreason - Now I realize that you dislike that I read her reaction to my post as her being offended.
I take it back for your own peace of mind.soundofreason - I am sorry if "peace of mind" is not adequate for you.
Ultimately, I am sorry my post made it to the front page.soundofreason - That is what I should have said in my first comment and all of this could have been avoided. I am genuinely glad we had this conversation.soundofreason
- btw i'm still implying that either your an idiot or a dickhead for deploying such defensive semantics given the context. just tick the box.kingsteven
- I'm only seeing your comment between my points 1-3 & 4-5 now.
I don't know how to explain to you why I didn't tick the box.soundofreason - Maybe you don't this but some threads are marked nsfw, meaning that ticking the box for posts inside those threads is not necessary.soundofreason
- I WRONGLY thought I had posted in one of those threads. That's why I didn't tick the box. But I agree that those boxes should be used.soundofreason
- i am totally aware of all of this. look, you assumed offence and apologised defensively as if someone had been offended. i read sea's post,kingsteven
- didn't see the 'offence' and read your comments for dickery as a result. this has only ever been about ticking the NSFW box.kingsteven
- I truly didn't mean to be a dick by saying "I'm sorry I offended you". I can now see how you read that in a dickish way.soundofreason
- grand so. btw if this was about someone being offended i would be on your side.kingsteven
- Wow. Okay well that went well. lol to be clear, that qbnx thread should be automatically flagged for nsfw. I believe it was handled by mods last night.sea_sea
- I def agree with sea sea, shitty Photoshop work should not be highlighted on the front page of a design focused site.robotron3k
- That being said, love your dick everyone, those who have one or access to one.robotron3k
- Cool or shitty image, is irrelevant. I understand it was an honest mistake now so it's water under the bridge really and if I came across as upset, well I was.sea_sea
- lol @robosea_sea