Politics

Out of context: Reply #28945

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,477 Responses
  • utopian2

    #MakeRussiaGreatAgain

    • greatest christmas evarrrrrCygnusZero4
    • #fakenews
      ***airhorn blas***
      monospaced
    • oh yesfadein11
    • not a crime but ok, LET’S KEEP THE SHITSHOW ROLLING!IRNlun6
    • lol, trumptards are all over the internet arguing that lying about russian ties isn't criminal, and should therefore be ignoredmonospaced
    • All we know is he lied and is pleading guilty. Anything else is pure speculation. But everyone is enjoying this so have fun...IRNlun6
    • and you continue to support and defend this shitshow of an administration, along with all the idiots and assholes ... have fun.monospaced
    • here's the justice department docs https://www.justice.…IRNlun6
    • 'statement of the offense' lays it all outIRNlun6
    • Yes it lays out that the trump administration, including him, were lying about connections to Russia. Not a crime so okay? Ffs wake up.monospaced
    • did you read it?IRNlun6
    • yupmonospaced
    • Thanks for sharing and letting me confirm that he was in fact lying to the FBI and that he is pleading guilty to the criminal charge associated with that.monospaced
    • cool, because that’s true. the timeline though shows it was after the election.IRNlun6
    • ...monospaced
    • And that he was under surveillance, which is how they got him on this. Trumps team was being surveilled.IRNlun6
    • Him meeting those officials as part of the transition team is not unlawful, but for whatever reason he didn’t admit to it.IRNlun6
    • His lawyer says he wants to tell the story. Soon he will and should be real interesting however it goes.IRNlun6
    • Right. He lied about it. Kushner lied about it. Donald Trump senior and junior lied about it. Manafort did too. Real interesting indeed.monospaced
    • What's weird is that the fbi cleared him.IRNlun6
    • tried to post a link but it's too long. NYTimes article titled "FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit"IRNlun6
    • That's Jan 23, 2017. In those court documents, the date he's charged with lying on is Jan 24. Why would he lie to the fbi after he got cleared? Makes no sense.IRNlun6
    • Yeah. Because he LIEDmonospaced
    • If you're trying to argue he didn't lie, give up.monospaced
    • IRNlun6 = #youmad

      /thread
      sofakingback
    • I agreed he lied, he plead guilty to it. It's just very odd that he lied after the FBI had already cleared him. And lied about a meeting that wasn't illegal.IRNlun6
    • A conversation he full well knew was likely being recorded and where nothing illegal was discussed.IRNlun6
    • Not making any guesses but I think the Dems are celebrating pre-maturely again...IRNlun6
    • Here's what truly sad. You consume your energy on DEMS, as if the world depends of one being right or wrong. Its clearly all you care aboutsofakingback
    • and all the while you negate that the guy you voted for was clouding with a foreign government to rig an election and knowingly undermining foreign policysofakingback
    • Facts are there. but you feel personally invested and would rather back a man that lies to you and betrays your country over having to admit that you are wrongsofakingback
    • I often wonder how nazi supporters feel now after all these years have passed. Do they have remorse? I hope I can ask you the same question, in time. ;)sofakingback

View thread