Pic of the Day

Out of context: Reply #108572

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 129,679 Responses
  • utopian-4

    • looks like a legit pollsarahfailin
    • Completely legit: http://nypost.com/20…Nanocephalic
    • it's dumb they did that, but if the numbers add up, the WW2 was 4 years and 5+ mil died, that's 150 die per hour for 1460 days straight, non-stop!? wow?robotron3k
    • fucking robo, stfu ... seriously, you clearly don't know jack shit about this and you sicken me even questioning itmonospaced
    • ^ why not? I have actually no idea as I wasnt there but why cant things be questioned? Isnt it healthy to question historical sources?mugwart
    • Oh FFS. "Is it not healthy...?" Come on, we all know this "questioning" is meant as way of casting doubt.nb
    • 5m in 40,000 forced labour camps = 125 per camp... Obvs. not how it worked (1.1m dead at Auschwitz) but is that easier to get your head around you fucking fuck?kingsteven
    • I mean, scepticism is scepticism. Failure to recognise the scale of WWII is beyond idiotic.kingsteven
    • I'm not saying it's not okay to question, but his question is so full of stupid that he comes off as a stupid motherfucker for itmonospaced
    • The records of the numbers killed has been so well documented it's insane. To question it is not only ignorant, it comes off as borderline retard, at the mildesmonospaced

View thread