Politics

Out of context: Reply #27469

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,467 Responses
  • oey3

    US Military spend more money in Viagra than with its Trans Troops.
    Fucking LOL!...

    So many old generals needing a lift up...

    • seriously, what a fucking joke.oey
    • One weekend golfing trip would cover it.BusterBoy
    • please don't mix stuff...LOL!oey
    • generals need help launching their rocketsoey
    • five times more! 5 times! 5x!oey
    • USA USA USAutopian
    • His Mar a Lago trips cost more too https://www.usatoday…lowimpakt
    • So the money reason was just a bad excuse. Got it.monospaced
    • Inside Trump’s snap decision to ban transgender troops
      http://www.politico.…
      Bluejam
    • diversion.sted
    • Trans Troops would make up .03% of its US Military. Is it possible that US Military is dosing on over $1.2Billion in viagra over 10 years?omg
    • dude...oey
    • do you really think discrimination is correct? people are healthy and full capable and want to "defend" their country...your President wasn't even in service.oey
    • he wrote/promised he would defend their rights. what's your explanation for this? seriously. give me some logic. you defend someone who spends millions in golf.oey
    • fucking LOL!oey
    • so cutting off your dick and fitting you with a nice pair of tits makes you fight better huh?omg
    • you do realize the discussion is military, not healthcareomg
    • you can't go into battle with a bunch of rubber dongs, itchy vaginas, and boobs. Send in f-15s far better investment.omg
    • no one ever said it makes you fight better it's about the right to serve, it's not a discussion if it makes you better. nobody said that.oey
    • since when aren't women capable of fighting? since when does gender has an influence on will?oey
    • and what do you need all that Viagra for? does it make guys fight better. now that's healthcare issue...viagra.oey
    • omg, speaking for deplorable dumfucks nationwide, on a design forum where nobody likes him ... the comedy continuesmonospaced
    • you can't go into battle with boobs? look at the Kurdish women fighting...there were always women warriors. you fucking misogynist.oey
    • lol ... omg is now extending this to women, saying they can't go into war ... seriously?monospaced
    • History is full of examples. instruct yourself. rubber dongs...fucking LOL! I guess you have a Mother, right? Is she inferior?oey
    • It's about spending on shit that you need in the battlefield. What the hell are you going to do with a fake dick and vagina?omg
    • what the hell are going to do wit a real dixk or a real vagina? and with viagra? and with golf?oey
    • real dick?oey
    • seriously, what are you going to do with the viagra? fuck the enemy to death?oey
    • what about the israeli army? they are loaded with women.oey
    • If you have to choose one thing to save the country. Either it's a loaded f-15, or some dude who's playing with his new vagina. Which would you choose?omg
    • ...oey
    • lol, omg, listen to yourself ... you're talking about people who are willing to go into battle and die for this country.monospaced
    • what's wrong with supporting a woman who's willing to do this? your "joke" about dildos and vaginas is so fucking disrespectful it's borderline offensive.monospaced
    • I say "joke" because I think you're genuinely against women, gays and transgender serving in the military, like the rest of the deplorable dumbfucks.monospaced
    • There is no gender or sex discrimination going on here.omg
    • All men and women are allowed in the military, whether they are gay or straight.omg
    • It's not worth the 1000% markup to issue a sex change costing $1.2Billion over 10 yearsomg
    • stfu "you can't go into battle with a bunch of rubber dongs, itchy vaginas, and boobs. " — omg, this threadmonospaced
    • There's no strategic advantage to even condone such efforts when engaging the enemy.omg
    • thanks for confirming your bigotrymonospaced
    • It's not an intolerance towards others. it's simply not cost effective.omg
    • if they take out the provision that gives out free sex changes, then it would be a different story.omg
    • but as i said, all men and women, including gay and straight are free to join the military still. that's justices for all.omg
    • *yawn ... just stop typingmonospaced
    • You probably wanted to hear how only focusing on men and women ignores the other 62 gendersomg
    • *sighmonospaced
    • you continue to let us know what a complete asshole you truly are ... keep it up sad little buddymonospaced
    • no ones being an asshole around here. except for you, but I'm not calling you out on it.omg
    • You been trying to push a fake bigotry narrative but failed, and look ridiculous attempting to justify your pink hat stance who normally excludes transgenders.omg
    • But go ahead and keep pushing your "pussy power" and how "pussies grab back"omg
    • thanks again, you're really showing your true colors tripling down on your assholeness ... congrats, it's official you're the biggest piece of shit heremonospaced
    • except you've never even validated any points for your concern except thru your brute name calling and you want to call me an asshole? take a look in the mirroromg

View thread