Star Trek: Discovery

Out of context: Reply #17

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 126 Responses
  • hotroddy0

    I know star trek prides itself in being 'progressive' with it's acceptance on race, culture, gender etc.

    But it still sounds stupid to this day to hear 'where no person has gone before' rather 'than no man has gone before'. The latter was so perfect.

    And Having a chick seems stupid. Viewers will relate more with a captan kirk or JLP over the captain katherine whaterver.

    But I think they do it as a good promotional angle. As it's a good message. "LOOK HOW PROGRESSIVE AND ACCEPTING WE HAVE BECOME IN THE FUTURE".

    hotroddy 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • female captain seems almost like an obligation. not super thrilled but holding it out so i don't look like a misogynistscarabin
    • hey we have a female Dr Who and a Prime Minister nowGardener
    • i guess we are already in the future.hotroddy
    • In any case, it's 'where no-one has gone before', not 'where no person'.Continuity
    • that's not as bad. but not memorable IMHPhotroddy
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread