Politics

Out of context: Reply #26942

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,468 Responses
  • lowimpakt2

    in April the head of the NRA said that "academic elites, political elites, and media elites. These are America’s greatest domestic threats"

    These sound like the words of Pol Pot.

    • Given the fact the Republicans are anti-intellectual, this assessment is hardly surprising.Continuity
    • The intellectualism of labeling all Republicans nazis, assassination plays, hold fake decapitated heads, shooting congressmen, antifa... all while denying it.IRNlun6
    • You really haven't decended from the trees, or started walking upright on your hind legs yet, have you?Continuity
    • funny how only the most delusional alt-right devotees hear level-headed liberals calling them nazis, while nobody else doesmonospaced
    • IRNlun6 no offense, but you're really starting to sound Phycho Joe low I.Q. Crazy IRNlun6 right now.kona
    • the absolute dumbfuck idiocy of labeling rich nerds as a threat in order to justify owning guns ... only out dumbfucked by its supporters (IRN, that's you)monospaced
    • "smart, successful, popular people, we need guns to stop them!" -- idiotmonospaced
    • All that violence it totally irrelevant to you all. All a big joke right? But you want to insult and lecture me. I'm not in a good mood and this shit riles me..IRNlun6
    • Ah yes, the ceaseless, brutal, persecuting violence of the left ... the group less likely to carry military-grade weaponry to use on their fellow citizens.Continuity
    • Unless you're counting common sense, intelligence and progressive vision as violence. I could see how the cro-magnon brain could interpret it like that.Continuity
    • The difference is that we didn't elect Kathy Griffin president.yuekit
    • I suppose, if I put myself in your position for a moment, it can't be much fun watching the rest of the world running intellectual circles around you.Continuity
    • IRNlun6, what's the democrat version of the NRA? i.e. an organisation with 5 million + members, ear of the dumbfuck president etc?lowimpakt
    • I mean that would have been pretty stupid right, putting a TV star in charge of your kids future just because they say obnoxious things about peopleyuekit
    • you don't like...yeah that would be dumb.yuekit
    • The left that ignores violence, encourages it, and then cries wolf.IRNlun6
    • The NRA is being revealed as nothing but fear based marketing apparatus who's sole purpose is to help sell more guns.kona
    • The telling thing about that NRA video is that 90% of the complaints are about the left having different opinions and expressing them.kona
    • the left isn't ignoring the violence, and isn't encouraging it though ... and please, don't cite a fucking b-list celebrity gag as if that's an actual examplemonospaced
    • Trump was the one getting gun owners all excited, telling them that 2nd amendment people could do something about Hillarymonospaced
    • And also 'doing something' about protesters at his rallies. Ah, but that's not violence right?Continuity
    • The democratic version of the NRA is the NRA. They protect the 2nd amendment rights of all Americans. It's not just Republicans that own firearms.IRNlun6
    • And I'm not and have never been a Republican.IRNlun6
    • Yeah I believe Trump said he would pay the legal fees of anyone who beat up protesters at one of his rallies.yuekit
    • Protesters hired by the Dems to purposefully cause violence. Robert Creamer and his firm had to resign over that.IRNlun6
    • Still, I don't like or encourage violence. Self-defense is another matter.IRNlun6
    • Are you serious? Yes that happened months later, reportedly (if James O'Keefe, a guy known for deceptively editing his videos, can be trusted).yuekit
    • But you have no evidence at all that those particular protesters were paid or wanted to cause violence, and neither did Trump when he encouraged his supportersyuekit
    • to beat the shit out of them.yuekit

View thread