Vid of the Day

Out of context: Reply #25312

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 35,331 Responses
  • omg-4

    • Cunt.BusterBoy
    • 1. Conspiracy theories are usually paranoid fantasies.
      2. He's making a very, very good point.
      jagara
    • ^No. No he's not.BusterBoy
    • I will discuss this over chamomile tea, but not on the internet.jagara
    • First comment 'Even a child can intuitively grasp that basic physics debunks the official narrative.'set
    • Yup 150,000 scientists and engineers are wrong. 1 idiot with a YouTube channel is right._niko
    • Sorry 1 idiot with a YouTube channel and a cardboard maquette._niko
    • lol where exactly are you getting your numbers? Your info?set
    • Ridicule only works when it makes senseset
    • Tell us the story of how you think it went down. Tell us the sequence of events from the beginning and we'll dissect it, see if it holds up._niko
    • No. Please don't tell us that story. If you're a conspiracy theory, ignorant cunt, no amount of logic will change your mind.BusterBoy
    • Logic like Silverstein taking out new insurance that covers what happened just months before it happened?set
    • Logic like him and none of his family went to work that day?set
    • Logic like fighter jets weren't scrambled to one of the most protected airspaces on the planet?set
    • Logic that suggests how unlikely it is that two amateur 'pilots' could successfully hijack and then fly huge commercial jets into the relatively small buildingsset
    • Logic that suggests how fucking ridiculous it is that they found their passports in the rubble?set
    • Heat that was strong enough to melt steel beams but not passports?set
    • Logic that suggests how astronomically unlikely it is that both buildings, that were built specifically not to come down, came down?set
    • And not just came down but fully and perfectly demolished within an incredibly small amount of time?set
    • Logic that shows you how fundamental the whole event was in changing politics for the benefit of the war mongering US government?set
    • I could go on and on but I'm not sure there's much point. People still regraded enough not to question it are a truly lost causeset
    • you just like to sit on your self righteous pedestal and look down upon the "uninformed." gimme a break with all this conspiracy bullshit.dorf
    • you're just spewing conspiracy bullshit. All of those things could be coincidences, but I'll give you that GWBush was in on it and that the passports were plant_niko
    • ..ed and that all the jews missed work that day. Whether true or not I'll give you that. But don't tell me the buildings went down via controlled demolition,_niko
    • that's utter nonsense. the amount of people required to be in on it and pull it off without suspicion or evidence after the fact is ridiculous and unnecessary_niko
    • remember back in '91 when they tried to blow up the towers? If they went through all the trouble of setting up explosives to bring down the tower in 9-11, why_niko
    • not just blame those crazy arabs again? Just say they succeed this time. Why go through the trouble of crashing planes into the building? then what? somebody_niko
    • was sitting there with a detonator making sure the building came down floor by floor?
      And then they removed all evidence afterwards? no wires, no explosives
      _niko
    • nothing was ever found. And the heat didn't let the beams, just weekend the metal enough to buckle. Tons of experiments have been done to prove this._niko
    • set, is this possible? https://www.youtube.…_niko
    • or is it more possible that they managed to sneak a thousand tons of explosives and detonator and wires into the walls of every floor of the towers and not_niko
    • raise suspicion? I notice if my garbage can has been moved never mind if wall were brought down, explosives installed and then re-drywalled and painted._niko

View thread