blog
blog
Out of context: Reply #65338
- Started
- Last post
- 75,620 Responses
- utopian0
- "Fake News" - Team Trumputopian
- "Liberal Retards at it again" - Fox Newsutopian
- "Drill Baby Drill" - GOP & Exxon Mobileutopian
- "The Greatest Hoax" - Nreitbart Newsutopian
- "Climate change fears overblown" - Rex Tillerson, United States Secretary of Stateutopian
- "Skeptics Can Be Prosecuted for Fraud, So Can Alarmists”" - Scott Pruitt, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agencyutopian
- "Global warming is a hoax created by the Chinese" - Donald J. Trump, President of the United Statesutopian
- #GlobalWarming #HOAXpablo28
- #alternativefactsmonospaced
- red is bad, right?Gnash
- so data back to 1880... and the dark blue to darkest red represents what half a degree? I'd like to see the data being modeled. come on we as designersdeathboy
- know how easy it is to visually manipulate data into representing something far different than the truth to help push our ends.deathboy
- another thing i'd suggest ppl question is to see how the model shown would play out 70 years in the future to see if it might be "alarmist" at all. but maybedeathboy
- thats too rational to ask in todays emotional driven media landscape of disinformationdeathboy
- FakeTopian™ http://www.breitbart…Hayoth
- you are welcome to run analysis on NASA data. it may require a Phd.ftp://ftp.ncdc.n...dorf
- ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa...dorf
- hmm.. ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pu...dorf
- read this, link is in comments.
https://goo.gl/LrbvD…dorf - i meant specific data used to create the video. especially concerned with datatypes pre 50s workin with more modern datasets in the same visualizationdeathboy
- oh wait maybe that is the basic numbers they're are pulling from. Doesn't seem to have any documentation on how the numbers were measured or where they came frodeathboy
- ERSSTv4.. the more you dig the more error and bias. types of infilling, and limited data sets. Curious about actual sensors that making up 2°grid(9500sqmi).deathboy
- at the end of the day its a bunch of data that is mostly noise and is quite limited. It's like trying to analyze stock data and make predictionsdeathboy
- who knows maybe it will be popular theory in the future nuclear testing of the 60s was a direct cause of trends from 70s-2040s. it can only be in hindsightdeathboy
- global fart mapsted
- well, here's the ERSSTv4 paper, https://goo.gl/UaHYu…, please point out all the flaws.dorf
- i looked dorf. its complex data sets that have been finessed. its like a version of the bible. some people believe. some dont. i question the motive and sourcedeathboy
- hate to say it but your climate scientist "data modeler" is the new religion for those who think so highly of the human race and its abilitiesdeathboy
- the infilling, the very broad datasets that cant are based on other underlying datasets that are suppose to be taken for granted while the current sets changedeathboy
- the pure focus only on known data while ignoring all unknown data or treating other data as anomalies... knowing what it takes for real scientific data in contdeathboy
- rolled areas vs sensors in uncontrolled environments and hoping on averages... i dont think the climate people are any different than local weathermandeathboy
- tell me this dorf. how is it you believe the new model for 1880 temp vs previous? instead of disproving why not try to explain your belief in it?deathboy
- i think its far more telling when people blindly believe in things they don't understand, but take for granted others say its so. that is the kind of crap thatdeathboy
- drives religion. magic. the idea of magic and spoken words. that idea likely was developed by people who didn't know how to read.deathboy
- i dont know. to me its all driven by crony capitalism, know one knows shit. they all act like they do as a hustle. seo, analytics, big data, mc hammer pants gendeathboy
- All you're doing is presenting personal opinions which I don't care for. Unless you post where the data is flawed and why, don't bother continuing, it's uselessdorf
- the data is flawed because if methods of infilling that dont take so many things into context. your turndeathboy
- it might be personal but its personal like seeing a ball go in the air and understand its going to come down personal. its just common sensedeathboy
- small sample sizes. the way the sizes are measured. the fact its global avg. its all just data with out meaning. unless u liek to state a meaning and why?deathboy
- other than that i can contest their data and measurements but its all meaningless, except for a fancy info grahic that serves as disinformationdeathboy
- disninformation on the idea of the color exageration where the the avg mean temp is but a degreedeathboy
- good unbiased data would inform you of the scale you are seeing. of the details. this is purely motivateddeathboy
- dorf would u except the idea that all global climate change is motivated by money and interested parties to dupe the public as advertising in support?deathboy
- instead of believing data from alruistic angels who have no monetary interest related to their fields or reason for creating datadeathboy
- to me it seems like public mesmerized by a lady sawed in half. not knowing the trick. and i think that is the artdeathboy
- oh and u know erssatv4 is based on contested foundation already. do u know difference between science and data modelsdeathboy
- i dont care if i am proven wrong. but so many ppl have a hard time accepting what they believe is wrongdeathboy
- the non religious laugh at the religious while following whatever dogma theyre taught. its just a big joke to medeathboy
- and for shits and giggles dorf present your data as not personal opinion. i find its all personaldeathboy
- please jsut consider the idea of what u are told is wrong. if not its nothing newdeathboy
- As far as opinions go, I think anyone who posts in the comment box more than 2 times in a row has mental issuesscruffics
- lol@scrufficsfadein11