UFO of the day

Out of context: Reply #424

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,032 Responses
  • Maaku-1

    If UFOs are man-made, why aren't people more interested in this shit? I'd love to know more about being able to get to the moon in 5 mins. Aren't people curious?!!?

    • UFOs aren't man made that's why it's "unidentified flying object"sted
    • ^ yeah but that's one of the strongest arguments against alien ships, so just saying if that's the case, then... <<Maaku
    • UFO's are UFO's.inteliboy
    • It's absolutely and utterly obvious that humans have technology and probably crafts that the masses are not aware of yet.set
    • Indeed Set. 100%.fadein11
    • It's obvious that things we don't definitively know exist, in fact exist. Without evidence. Am I interpreting that correctly? Hopefully there'll be a Trump leakBuddhaHat
    • Or, in the absence of tangible evidence, detailed, peer-reviewed scientific research?BuddhaHat
    • Do you think every single technology project is public knowledge? Because if yes, you're a cunt.set
    • You don't think the US, Russian etc militaries are working on secret aircraft projects? Of course they are.set
    • That's a given...set
    • LOL @ 'cunt' comment, hahaha! I 'believe' that some space agencies do have some things we don't know about. That doesn't constitute proof.BuddhaHat
    • This is feeling a bit chicken-and-egg to me... declaring existence without proof, or denying existence without proof. What do both positions lack? Proof.BuddhaHat
    • Well my stance is that regardless of proof, we all know that militaries are developing technology under wraps and so some ufos are probably human in originset
    • I'd quicker believe we had some super futuristic secret gov projects before crying "aliens are here!" Agree there absolutely must be.monospaced
    • I'd even guess that most UFOs are either man made or just a misinterpretation of something natural. I wish aliens were visiting though. Would be rad.monospaced
    • don't crush our speilbergian ET dreams set.inteliboy
    • While I don't disagree that there are likely secret future tech projects, ehT about them being top secret with no evidence is "utterly obvious?"monospaced
    • Derpset
    • If the average public, look up and see something they are not familiar with, they think it's a UFO. It could well be a drone etc..fruitsalad
    • Those untouched natural tribes in the Amazon.. they think a 747 is a UFO, they think it's a bird god.fruitsalad
    • and they're right, because it's unidentifiedmonospaced
    • @fruitshoots - you do know there have been sightings from very credible witnesses (i.e. pilots, military, police etc. who are trained to observe) going wayfadein11
    • back before drones were even a minor itch in your daddy's left bollock?fadein11
    • Wow. Sightings! How interesting. People seeing shit and telling their stories. So credible.monospaced
    • They send people to life in prison for murder based on eye witness reports. There are millions of sightings, including many government and military officialsset
    • To rubbish that off like you just did is simply unintelligent.set
    • okaymonospaced
    • (actually has no bearing on my intelligence, just my opinion on what I intelligently decide for myself is believable)monospaced
    • It's unintelligentset
    • De-intelligentset
    • Nintendolligentset
    • No it isn't. intelligence and ones susceptibility to inferring conspiracy are not related in the slightest. You of all people must concede thismonospaced

View thread