blog
Out of context: Reply #64705
- Started
- Last post
- 75,618 Responses
- GeorgesII-7
"There are more than enough image-based threads as it is. We don't need them for every instantaneous thought someone comes up with."
moderator will all due respect, I thought this was a design forum were any form of visual art is accepted,
triangle, circle, white, yellow, rooad rage, skulls, etc etc, according to you l of these could be deleted too..
Here was I thinking that there were a certain set of rules and everything was permitted as long as these threads weren't toxic and didn't infringe on these set rules.
I thought the rules were simple, you post stuff and if people don't care it gets ignored and the thread die,
it has worked like this for the 15 years I've been here without a single problem, if it's now up to the moderator to decides what stays and what goes even if the threads are benign and will not change anything to the flow of information,
what's the point to have a public voice?
- lol.since1979
- why do you actually care?fadein11
- Then repost it titled as "Associate to Looking Up," not "GUUYYYYYSSSS"Moderator
- My only input is that unless Benfal himself requested the benfal of the day thread deleted, then whoever deleted it is a raging shitlord supreme.set
- thanks mod, but it's fine, I just wanted to know why. now I know, I'll move onGeorgesII
- You're welcome. No offense meant. Just trying to avoid vague thread titles on the occasion they pop up.Moderator
- oh shush - when they're on the ball they've always deleted shit threads, my own and everyone else's included.detritus
- ^ yepfadein11
- Goddamn it set.
A poorly timed sip of coffee while reading your post = cleanup in aisle 6.kona - Georges of the Dayutopian
- I'm glad Moderator knows where to draw the line. This time you went too far Georges!ORAZAL
- I tough that it will be a coming out thread :(sted