Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #20674
- Started
- Last post
- 33,469 Responses
- monospaced1
- actually what he said was taken out of context. credible main stream media post, and its GQ mag. gaud media is gone to shit..yurimon
- he spent several minutes talking about context and how it's impossible to ignore itmonospaced
- Media companies will do and say anything to grow their audience. Trump is their meal ticket right now. It'll be their shame if they lose him for the next 4 yrs.omg
- Yes, a vote for Trump is a guarantee that the media shitstorm will continue in the wake of the deplorable, thoughtless shit Trump says. make merka gr8 agin!monospaced
- I'm curious as to what context, EXACTLY, Trump's comments should be taken in, in order to not interpret them as Keith has.monospaced
- Confrontation is better than insinuation which begins with seduction. False messages running through your mind, free to imagine what it wants. Truth is friend.omg
- the whole thing was about the 2nd amendment nothing with threatening her. this was a complete run with putting it out of context.yurimon
- this what i like about trump. the media is trying to prop her up so much at the cost of the medias credibility.yurimon
- Please put it in context. Thanks.monospaced
- Cmon mono, Trump was just being sarcazzztic ... jeez.Ramanisky2
- this one is reaching for straws big time. i wonder who eats this stuff up without checking.yurimon
- Please check for us. Thank you. Waiting to hear what trump really meant, and what the correct interpretation is in the right context.monospaced
- yeah look it up he was talking about the 2nd amendment. you got fingers?yurimon
- but thanks for sharing. i didnt realize how far reaching the media crap is. this mind blowing at the extremity of GQ.yurimon
- Yes he was talking about the 2nd amendment. And he was talking about Hillary being shot too. No googling necessary. I looked it all up.monospaced
- Waiting still for the context where that isn't what he meant. your failure to provide this is just proof that is exactly what he meant.monospaced
- Unless of course you're just defending trump and his implication that Hillary should be shot to death. That actually makes sense because you are morally fucked.monospaced
- And that only means you are in fact the one brainwashed by the alt right media and it's conspiracy theories and flat out lies. Guess you'll believe anything.monospaced
- yeah im morally fucked. mr <-H bot. i listened to the actual speech. tone was not implying it at all.yurimon
- The deplorable yurinalRamanisky2
- this video was a steaming pile of horse shit. he used a whole lot of words to say nothing and this quote is miles away from any kind of incitement to violenceterry_cloth
- the fake indigence and catty scolding is cringeworthy, why did you post this drivelterry_cloth
- just read you and yuri's little back and forth and you seem to really buy into this fruity hysterical guys nonsense. you seem genuinely confused, maybe i can hterry_cloth
- elp clear this up. so, bodyguards have fire arms to be on equal footing with criminals who may intend to use fire arms against their client. criminals don't havterry_cloth
- -e fire arms legally. saying you don't support the second amendment while being surrounded by bodyguards with guns is an interesting irony that trump is pointiterry_cloth
- -ng out. nobody misunderstood that message except for idiots looking for something to get hysterical overterry_cloth
- She of course does support the second amendment though. When trump said otherwise it was a straight up lie.monospaced
- Talk about buying into shit. Both of you.monospaced
- this post is embarrassing mono, even for liberals. Its ok cause bad unresearched posts happen i guess.yurimon
- oh look there is a big h flag in the background. hmmm <-H news. never heard of that network.yurimon
- He is obviously referring to her stance on gun controll. It's interesting g to me, you extrapolated all sorts of crazy shit out of his body guard statement butterry_cloth
- When he says she wants to destroy the second amendment you take that literally. Confirmation bias perhaps. I am doing the opposite of buying into anythingterry_cloth
- Whatever she said, HE was the one who insinuated she should be killed. Thats' the context. Period. Go ahead, keep trying to defend him.monospaced
- he challenged her to disarm her guards because it shows a double standard of who would be allowed to protect themselves. its pretty obvious.yurimon
- he commented on her going after the 2nd amendment like yo boy ob did, a continuation.yurimon
- but she didn't ever say she wanted to repeal the 2nd amendment, that is completely made upmonospaced
- both sides say bull crap. he is playing on overall direction of the dem party. true or not, just like speculations, stereo types, who knows.yurimon
- but overall if a they choose a supreme court judge, what would be the interpretations of constitution. court is already being corrupted in my mindyurimon
- scalia was a good interpreter of the constitution. living method is like you give a dumbed down millennial authority to make legal choices.yurimon
- No mono, that was not the insinuation at all, I'm sorry but you are a hysterical moron. I'm done with this convo, good dayterry_cloth
- Of course it was the insinuation. To argue otherwise is ridiculous. I'm not hysterical either.monospaced