Politics

Out of context: Reply #20427

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,467 Responses
  • omg-5

    • Keep up the good fight and I thank you for supporting my campaign!

      TRUMP ADMINISTRATION 2k16!
      RealDonaldTrump
    • Trump wishes he thought of creating 20 million jobs by transitioning to 100% clean renewable energy by 2030omg
    • haha what are u talkin about trump would create 30 million jobs transitioning by 2025. Always such bold statements for max 8 years service.deathboy
    • cant companies get sued for false advertisements? wonder if it would be possible to sue a politician for frauddeathboy
    • https://memecrunch.c…deathboy
    • Can I sue a concert aimed at ending world hunger? Please.monospaced
    • I highly doubt Trump is going to create 30 million jobs simply by building your wall.omg
    • yea you can if they lie about use of funds and what not. they likely don't promise to end hunger.deathboy
    • no he will do it the same way in less time, so in fact its in less time he will probably create 40 million jobs.deathboy
    • such false statements should be criminal because people like you fall for themdeathboy
    • I can't tell, are you actually saying you think trump could do that or are you just being sarcastic?monospaced
    • no both statements are absolutely untrue. im just displaying how easy it is to say whatever. trump already says whatever but stein is off the chartsdeathboy
    • Hamonospaced
    • Eventually you have to add up the facts to see whether or not an idea can hold water.omg
    • The energy market is worth over $600B and seeing an est. 14% growth rate per year. Which by itself can sustain a 1.5M jobs per year quota.omg
    • Obviously. That's called the scientific method. ;)monospaced
    • for funs OMG how many people will be displaced out of work that deals with non green energy? is that factored in to the creation number?deathboy
    • The new green deal would create a new wealth distribution as homeowners would be capable of collecting energy to sell back into the system.omg
    • The profits would not just stay at the top level, like they do with oil. A transition to cleaner energy opens more opportunities and benefits.omg
    • Much of the oils are foreign based sources, so worrying about job losses in that industry would not rest solely from within.omg
    • There are still other uses for oil, but our dependency on it for energy changes everything.omg
    • If it's such an equitable plan then then why would we want the federal government beurocracy to get involved and fuck it all upterry_cloth
    • government involvement would lower taxes, free education and student debt, improve foreign affair, better public assistance, while ending poverty.omg
    • so in other words you have no idea how many jobs it would displace? jsut how many it would createdeathboy
    • how would tanking oil prices improve foreign affairs? has that helped venezuela? middle east?deathboy
    • you say free education. hopefully you realize nothing is free. where are costs controls to this "free" system?deathboy
    • do you question any of this OMG? Or is that kool aid so tasty you don;t think about it?deathboy
    • i don't get it but seems like you have been stricken by some sort of evangelism for stein. water to wine stuffdeathboy
    • It would cost the US 380,000 jobs.omg
    • our involvement in wars due to oil could be eliminatedomg
    • the green plan establishes a platform where higher education is supported.omg
    • I tried looking at the other candidates but I happen to see Jill Stein as a better option.omg
    • well i guess i'd believe her to be the best option to if everything she said was real. unfortunately i have an idea of economics and historydeathboy
    • whats your economic and historical perspective on everything so far?omg
    • that more government only creates a ruling class and a poor class. no economy can flourish through central planning.deathboy
    • take for example gov role in driving college tuition through the roof. good intention hurt regular people while pushing banks profits ever higher.deathboy
    • your policy gives you what you hate. hasn't every measure made to curb such things done almost the exact opposite?deathboy
    • think about markets of a politcian. they have an incentive to sell a product. our culture responds that way. they make up these products to differentiat and getdeathboy
    • bought by voters. a politician wh says well a free market approach where i do nothing makes it look liek he has nothing to sell, and nothing to selldeathboy
    • to lobbysist either or on behalf. if you look at "calls". i think that is the major incentive flaw to politicians. they need to sell something and differentiatedeathboy
    • menat "calls" from public for fixes to problem. usually public never asked. do u think public asked for SS? No. It was sold to them.deathboy
    • How that program workign out? does that not hurt the poor the most taking money away from there tight paycheck and saying u can have it when your old?deathboy
    • wouldnt they be better having that money now for food, less stress and jsut working at an older age? let peopel decide whats best for them and their situationdeathboy
    • but to see any of this you have to get over the idea of equality as being good. when in fact its bad, its death, its stagnation and the enemy of life. its a 0deathboy
    • Bravo, well said. Thats a hard one for people to swallow now a days, people have believed the new wave commy shit and March around talking about ending povertyterry_cloth
    • And wealth redistribution as if that isn't right out of the manifesto. Smashing the bourgeoise just makes everyone poor, only a child or a simpleton would thinkterry_cloth
    • That that model has meritterry_cloth

View thread