Politics

Out of context: Reply #19858

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,467 Responses
  • IRNlun6-6

    Well, this is ironic. The US and Russia apparently have a treaty on mutual legal assistance on criminal matters. Signed by none other than Bill Clinton.

    • How is aiding in criminal investigations questionable? It's called helping each other out. Most nations work together to do this. Derp.monospaced
    • It literally says the assistance won't break the laws of either nation. It's just so criminal justice systems can share data. So what were you saying?monospaced
    • Mrs. Clintons 30,000 deleted emails is a criminal offense.IRNlun6
    • And that has nothing to do with this. Your point?monospaced
    • "providing document, records and other items"IRNlun6
    • The media has spent the entire day criticizing Trump for asking Putin for the illegally deleted documents.IRNlun6
    • But since she isn't Russian, her email server was in the US and she didn't flee there, none of what you're saying applies.monospaced
    • LOL. you're implying the leaks were a result of Russia cooperating with a federal investigation because of some conspiracy involving bill? So fucking stupid.monospaced
    • It does since Trump said "I hope you're able to find." Either way, a lot of attention on a federal crime.IRNlun6
    • They're criticizing trump because his assumption is ludicrous, reckless, uninformed and frankly, dangerous. Not to mention, idiotic.monospaced
    • What could be more dangerous than dismissing a Secretary of States crime?IRNlun6
    • During congressional hearings they wheren't allowed to name of the agency that provides clearance to the documents found on her server.IRNlun6
    • This would be more like if the U.S. government requested help from Russia on a case.yuekit
    • The FBI found plenty of evidence of a crime, they said so. They just decided to not charge her. People aren't just going to let it go away.IRNlun6
    • A little different from someone encouraging Russian hackers to break into the server of their political opponent, no?yuekit
    • No one encouraged hackers, read his quote. The state department reopened the case earlier this month so the request is perfectly legitimate.IRNlun6
    • Cmon IRNlun6, you can't be serious.yuekit
    • This thing you posted is obviously for when the U.S. requests help. Not for Russia to go around randomly stealing information.yuekit
    • Trump encouraged the hackers. Today!monospaced
    • She committed a serious crime. Why is this being dismissed as if it's nothing? I don't care who asks Russia. If they have something, share it.IRNlun6
    • It wasn't dismissed. And it also has nothing to do with the treaty you posted here.monospaced
    • He did not encourage hackers. Listen to his quote.IRNlun6
    • "Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." That encouraging it. He is literally hoping it is happening.monospaced
    • Regardless. You're implying that the same government that is conspiring to keep Hillary out of prison is the same one that is leaking DNC emails. Please.monospaced
    • Choose a conspiracy or two but at least make sure they don't directly contradict each other. Really doesn't look good.monospaced
    • "I hope you're able to find is" not encouraging hacking. Especially since the server is long gone.IRNlun6
    • Exactly why Trump's statement is fucking idiotic and therefore the entire point of this post is irrelevant.monospaced
    • If it's not encouraging what is it by the way? reason I ask is that you seem to be the lone person on the planet who doesn't see it that way. Besides yurimonospaced
    • The only conspiracy in all this is Russia being involved in DNC hacks. Which is unprovable since a number of countries and individuals are capable.IRNlun6
    • The other is the one where Hillary is getting out if serving time. Yknow. The one you're so triggered about.monospaced

View thread