Politics

Out of context: Reply #19258

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,468 Responses
  • Ramanisky25

    Senate Republicans have been pushing — and basically publicly pleading with — Trump to focus more on issues rather than personal attacks. Now they’re losing patience after the party’s standard bearer doubled down on his criticism of a judge presiding over cases against Trump University because of his “Mexican heritage.”

    Yeah ... best of luck GOP

    Ramanisky2 5Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • the judge issue only makes him look bad for people who already not going to vote for him or people who dont fact check the issue.yurimon
    • which most likely people who wont vote for him because of not fact checking ffsyurimon
    • YAWNNN!!!!
      fucking drek      Ramanisky2
    • @yuri, I checked the facts... trump said all that shit about the judge and is doubling down on the racismmonospaced
    • y'know, to make sure you don't accuse me of not checking themmonospaced
    • yUrine-von-drek doesn't give a fuck about factsRamanisky2
    • YAWNNN!!!!
      fucking drek      Ramanisky2
    • did you examine the judges actions mono?yurimon
    • His actions seem completely professional, impartial and lawful, which is expected from a judge of his stature and respect.monospaced
    • ^hahaha..yurimon
    • His refusal of a summary judgement is not biased. Based on the case it makes perfect sense. Plus he pushed it to November to avoid elections.monospaced
    • Those are facts. The lawsuits make valid claims and it's a constitutional right to a jury trial in civil cases like this. Curiel just did his job lawfully.monospaced
    • Shit. Even trumps own lawyers agree with Curiel and refuse to move forward with a motion to recluse. Claiming a bias is pure opinion. Fact.monospaced
    • If your only response is to laugh then you are the one not reviewing his motions and the facts.monospaced
    • mono don't waste your time
      just say ....
      fucking yUrine      Ramanisky2
    • mono, the woman that sued him gave him a great review. she withdrew as a plaintiff. the judge usually rules against the plaintiff in summary judgement formyurimon
    • in this case it didnt happen. case continued.yurimon
    • thats trumps n his lawyers argument especially if this judge continuously votes against the plaintiff in withdrawl but not in this caseyurimon
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread