Making A Murderder (Netflix Doc)

Out of context: Reply #57

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 77 Responses
  • Ben99-11

    When he says he killed a cat by setting him on fire. My girlfriend said "good for him! he deserved to be in prison!'' and we stop Netflix. Won't watch it.

    I agree. You kill a cat by setting him on fire. Rot in jail piece of shit.

    • Agreed. I made the same statement earlier and received -2 likes. But the doc does such a good job portraying a victim.hotroddy
    • One day maybe people will respect animals and see them as equal as us.Ben99
    • I think he gets a pass b/c he's from a poor roots. Like you don't know right from wrong being poor. If a rich kid had done it.. different storyhotroddy
    • Guess affluenza works both waysRamanisky2
    • come on, what self respecting hillbilly hasn't set a cat on fire at least once?_niko
    • is killing a cat for enjoyment better than killing a pig for your eating enjoyment?
      I fucking love bacon.
      _niko
    • i didn't downvote BTW, but I think you're being harsh...watch the whole thing_niko
    • If he ate the cat than I'd say I'm being harsh.hotroddy
    • If he wants to kill animals than he should work at a slaughter house.hotroddy
    • but I get your point... killing animals is hillbilly culturehotroddy
    • You have no soul if you can kill an animal like this and you have something fucked up in the brain if you think its not that bad to do this.Ben99
    • Its pure evil senseless heartless and souless to set an innocent cat on fire. Its pure cruelty. I'm really happy he spend that much time in prison.Ben99
    • But Ben doesn't age and upbringing factor in ???Ramanisky2
    • And I by no means condone what he did to the catRamanisky2
    • try him for the cat killing then, just because he's messed up doesn't mean he's guilty of everything else._niko
    • and I believe he was a kid when he lit the cat on fire. not defending him on this point, but I find your over-reaction strange when you have no problem eating_niko
    • ...animals_niko
    • if you're a vegan I apologize, but what's the difference between killing an animal for pleasure or killing and eating an animal for pleasure? Because in this_niko
    • ...day and age we don't need to eat animals to survive, it's strictly for our own pleasure._niko
    • eating an animal for pleasure is different than killing an animal for pleasure.hotroddy
    • i like eating fish... but I don't like fishing.hotroddy
    • yeah but someone has to kill it. I guess hunters do both, they like killing and eating animals, and it's probably not a stretch to say that steven was a hunter._niko
    • I just think it's funny how desensitized we are to killing people, we have no problem killing certain animals for food, but when it comes to cats and dogs.._niko
    • we lose our shit. rats and mice we can snap their necks and not think twice about it but other rodents like gerbils or bunnies are cute and therefore taboo._niko
    • so to sum up, he's a messed up hillbilly who got drunk and lit a cat on fire but it doesn't mean he killed anyone._niko
    • you also have to judge him by how he killed that cat. He didn't shoot him with his bb gun but doused him in gasoline and lit it on fire. thats specialhotroddy
    • for sure but was also young and drunk and maybe didn't want t kill it just get a twisted laugh. I think what Michael Vick did was 1000x worse._niko
    • michael vick did it over and over so yes... but lighting an animal on fire is pretty sick.hotroddy
    • FFS i never have the tought of hurting an animal ever, even drunk, young or wathever. It's not normal to do something like this.Ben99
    • are you a vegan? have you ever killed a mouse? a mosquito? a fly, an ant a spider? caught and ate fish? are all animals sacred or just pets?_niko
    • I think its more a series about corruption in US legal system - it's pretty obvious he was no angel - but was there evidence to convict him? prob not.fadein11

View thread