Shooting of the Day

Out of context: Reply #1550

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 2,778 Responses
  • uan0

    Inspired by Georges' documentaries entry about psychological warfare subversion, I think, you should make QBN great and start designing and posting better anti weapon material. And when you are at it, do it better (little tip learned from set).

    There is plenty of pro guns propaganda around, way more than anti weapon propaganda. Looks like there is plenty of design work that needs to be done in this regard. And it's a meaningful task for designers.

    • good speech, that we should continue to subvert truth, disregard the real reason for the decline and blindly take up a cause like every idiot has ever done inyurimon
    • history ever. good show mate.yurimon
    • you feel better than every idiot in history ever? really?uan
    • dude you are talking about putting out propaganda, in a world already full of shit. so tell me how you are helping again.yurimon
    • it's not propaganda, it's advertising for a cause they believe in.imbecile
    • so tell us how YOU'RE helping, yuri? You always say we're not acting, but fail to say how you are, it's getting oldmonospaced
    • i already posted broh. long ago.yurimon
    • welcome back bro. welcome back.yurimon
    • I'm talking about making good anti gun propaganda to change the attitude of the population towards the idea that guns are not a good thing.uan
    • why would you want to falsely manipulate people on something you may not be right about.yurimon
    • what is good or right about shooting people? you can settle differences peacefully.uan
    • Nothing good about shooting innocent people. Its a deeper subject. what if its meds that these people are taking? ever look into that subject?yurimon
    • its something that never comes up. why favor one industry over another? protect big pharma if their meds are to blame.yurimon
    • i wonder how yurimon would feel if someone used their right to bear arms to silence / oppress his opinions through violence. Would he still be so pro-gun?imbecile
    • is that a threat bro? its not a right for someone to inflict harm on other people. this is not the issue here. every crime is evaluated on an individual basisyurimon
    • it's about protecting the people and the right to life. not any corporation or industry.uan
    • If you want to look for patterns you dont just pick a political mantra. you want to evaluate the the core issue here. nothing wrong with it.yurimon
    • maybe you forget or don't know that you first are a human, and then you are an element of the system.uan
    • I think everyone forgets. its built into how people become part of the system.yurimon
    • sometimes the system acts against people who are supposed to be superior to the system.yurimon
    • I'm not a pro gun person. I'm arguing that there is more to be evaluated here. Just being pro or anti is not going to solve it. its a reactionary trap.yurimon
    • that's what I'm talking about. use design to change the system, aka use propaganda. free yourself and your entourage from the trap.uan
    • i dont know if you know what freedom is. you are going to be like every other duoche propagandist if you cant decipher truth from propaganda, why be that guyyurimon
    • +1 yuri. there are plenty of subversive douche bags pulling strings and attempting to manipuate, we don't need moregilgamush
    • think about this: you both might be victims of a pro gun driven propaganda campaign. funded by people who don't care about life.uan
    • and also, think (or go read/research) about the concept of 'truth'.uan

View thread