Donald Trump
Out of context: Reply #40
- Started
- Last post
- 9,457 Responses
- PonyBoy5
The tinfoil hat I'm about to put on my head was made from approx. 3 rolls of reynolds wrap... it's steady and secure... so here I go:
Trump was 'hired' by the Clintons to get in the race like a Ross Perot (except not third party... at least not yet) to act as a distraction for Hillary as she's scandal-riddled (how this woman / the Clintons in general keep their heads above water is beyond me). I used the term 'hired' but it's not a job so-to-speak as much as it is a long-term investment for Trump (after all, he is pretty tight w/Bill & Hillary— he even called Billy to let him know he was running—basically to say "Yo I'm in, B... tell your PAWG I got her back). Once he bails from the race (like Ross Perot did) you can expect to see the rest of the GOP candidorks attempt to gobble-up that Trump limelight.... and they'll all fail because they're not on the same level of Trump in terms of being a celebrity / entertainer who can get away with being shocking and dramatic. They attempt to be mouthy or funny and will fail at it like a Dad trying to 'be cool' in front of his teenage children... awkward and pitiful.
Trumps's making a sham of the entire GOP election process... He's merely a decoy... he's bait.
Or IS HE?
All that being said I'm not sure Trump is actually going to bail as planned becaaaaaause:
Bernie Sanders all-of-the-sudden is in play. HIllz didn't expect Bern-unit to be torching up the political scene like he is... I think she once again (just as she did w/B. Obama) underestimated her own party's opponents figuring the election was a 'gimmie'.
So, Trump may now see another opportunity and might actually see this all the way through as Hillary might actually have a ral battle of her own.
mmmmmm... yummy downvotes :)
- not bad, I got reamed earlier for saying something similar on trump n the clintons.. mono. what do you think? coming from someone else who isnt me.yurimon
- I'm wondering if Hillery is really going to get the curb. She is really dirty politically speaking.yurimon
- downvoted then realized it wasnt yuri so upvotedmoldero
- i kid, but yeah makes sense, theres talk of this a lotmoldero
- lol he said pawggilgamush
- I think you said it once or twice and it was fine. It was you saying it a hours and times on every post that got you reamed. Especially your insults.monospaced
- A hours and = a thousandmonospaced
- Won't matter once Bloomberg enters the race. He'll take the democratic vote easily from Hillary. ;)OP31
- Seems legit.Riley
- I think there's a definite possibility. Most likely, he just loves the spotlight and the sound of his own voice. Egomaniac that could control the entireformed
- election.formed
- I want you to seriously think about the logistics in pulling off a "secret" Clinton-Trump partnership.nb
- Then, think about the massive risk that Clinton would be taking. It makes no sense. She was already the front-runner for president. Why tie herself to Trump?nb
- Then, consider that having Trump run is wildly unpredictable (they wouldn't be able to do polling or get data to figure out if the secret plan is working.)nb
- If you still think it's possible that Clinton and Trump have an arrangement, you're crazy. Come back to reality. This isn't a movie, it's real life.nb
- Running for president is an insanely complex business, and winning only happens with perfect timing and a perfect plan. Stop with the conspiracy nonsense.nb
- they already have an established relationship which includes donations.yurimon
- also the 3rd party card or the extreme card always draws or attempts to draw attention away from. trump always comes on the seen with 3rd party or lessyurimon
- mainstream politician starts gaining some ground. and tea party strategy worked in guiding the election.yurimon
- remember there are no sides on the top. just one direction. you had bush n kerry going against each other who were both skullnbones.yurimon
- its a club.end justifies the means and the public just watches a show they put on but in reality its one policy.yurimon
- You're insane if you think there are no sides at the top.nb
- I mean, not actually insane. Just dumb.nb
- I mean, not actually dumb. Just stupid.nb
- can you prove it? US policy has been going steady according to corp or banking interests since forever. doesnt matter whos in office so how is there 2 sides ifyurimon
- there is cow toeing to a couple of sources that already work together.yurimon
- only variable is how much we are willing to take.yurimon
- nb... this Shit the Clintons have pulled in the past is enough to tell me that this kind of action w/Trump would merely business as usual to them.PonyBoy
- They (the Clintons) have their own set of rules... this little scandal w/Hillary's email server should tell you that—or do you believe her when she plays dumb?PonyBoy