Art Bell Midnight in the Desert
Art Bell Midnight in the Desert
Out of context: Reply #3
- Started 10 years ago
- Last post 10 years ago
- 14 Responses
- ********4
Ooh Graham Hancock, superb. Thanks for sharing.
- Graham Hancock is so good.fadein11
- I wonder what mono thinks of Graham Hancock.yurimon
- I wonder what the response would be if I posted this show first in its own thread.yurimon
- hmmmm.yurimon
- nothing to dislike about hancock - pretty much everything he says makes total sense and is not far fetched.fadein11
- His theories are entertaining but I wouldn't say they "make total sense." There's a lot of stuff out there debunking him.yuekit
- Show me one refutable piece of evidence debunking one of his theories. Please...********
- He's an incredible astute and careful man, and only says things he is sure of, unlike many in this field.********
- Sceptics are fast becoming the ridiculous ones. Oh how things change :)********
- all of his "face on mars" bollocksscarabin
- I'm not claiming to be an expert on it. But here is a whole documentary analyzing his theories: https://www.youtube.…yuekit
- he's interesting and i like a lot of his ideas but he posts some outrageous woo on his FBscarabin
- he also changes data to fit his theories. like the locations of temples so they fit his orion alignment theory. and ignores data like the fact that theirscarabin
- creation date and purpose are literally etched into their stone wallsscarabin
- LOL at posting a BBC video.********
- Not even going to bother.********
- I've not heard him talk about the face on mars so can't comment, but I agree that whole subject might be clutching at straws a bit.********
- I presume Scarabin, you're the type of person that actually believes the great pyramid was a tomb? (lol)********
- Face on Mars has little to do with Hancock - you are getting confused with Richard Hoaglandfadein11
- It's just a video that interviews him and other archaeologists and gives you both sides of the argumentyuekit
- how do you know?yurimon
- Why did you ask for debunking if you weren't even willing to consider it?yuekit
- @set - he never has... Hancock doesn't have time for that kind of thing, as you say he approaches things v.rationally.fadein11
- Scarabin showed his ignorance by mentioning the face on Mars so lets leave it there - nothing to do with Hancock.fadein11
- I won't consider for a second something the BBC puts out. If you fail to understand that then we have no place talking about it.********
- i haven't asserted any of my views apart from his FB posts. set asked for evidence showing graham has been wrong and i gave it to himscarabin
- took two seconds on google. like i said, i like a lot of his ideas and their drama appeals to me but he's not infallible by any meansscarabin
- and how is mentioning the face on mars ignorant? it's exactly what set asked for. lol.scarabin
- i love art bell ahaha forgot about his ass!rabbit
- You didn't show me a singlev peice of evidence proving him wrong, Scarabin
..? Ummm lol?******** - eva dance.yurimon
- @scarabin - its ignorant because the face on Mars is NOT one of Hancocks theories... At all. Associating him with kind of thing does him a disservice.fadein11
- read his "keeper of genesis". look at nasa photos.scarabin
- i get it, he's exciting, it's interesting. all i'm saying is you're hanging from his nuts like he's god or something. the man is stoned 18+ hours a day.scarabin
- he makes mistakes now and then. no big deal.scarabin
- Clearly you're utterly clueless on the subject, old friend. He gave up weed like 5-10 years ago. No ones hanging on his nutsack in the slightest.********
- I'd have a good go if it was in front of me though.********
- To say that he's never been proven wrong is a bit ridiculous. What he does is look for "clues" of ancient civilizations and then make huge extrapolations fromyuekit
- that. For instance Antarctica being the site of an ancient advanced society. You can believe his theories if you want but it's really more like he's never beenyuekit
- proven right.yuekit
- I do think it's an interesting thing to speculate about, but not sure why you would take this guy's particular theories as gospel.yuekit
- Who said he's never been proven wrong? Who cares - he has some great ideas. And very believable at that. The face on mars is nothing to do with him Scarabinfadein11
- you arrogant anus. And yes - he hasn't smoked weed for years. And you can hardly talk acid emo :)fadein11
- sure, whatever man. you sound like a christian but that's your choice. if you were being objective you would find info about him talking about the face on mars.scarabin
- i've got no horse in this race, just think it's funny how you two are acting about the guyscarabin
- carry onscarabin
- He's interesting and a nice chap with some v.interesting ideas, thats all I was saying. Would be happy for you to provide me with some linksfadein11
- Why you so bothered?fadein11