Art Bell Midnight in the Desert

Out of context: Reply #3

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 14 Responses
  • set4

    Ooh Graham Hancock, superb. Thanks for sharing.

    • Graham Hancock is so good.fadein11
    • I wonder what mono thinks of Graham Hancock.yurimon
    • I wonder what the response would be if I posted this show first in its own thread.yurimon
    • hmmmm.yurimon
    • nothing to dislike about hancock - pretty much everything he says makes total sense and is not far fetched.fadein11
    • His theories are entertaining but I wouldn't say they "make total sense." There's a lot of stuff out there debunking him.yuekit
    • Show me one refutable piece of evidence debunking one of his theories. Please...set
    • He's an incredible astute and careful man, and only says things he is sure of, unlike many in this field.set
    • Sceptics are fast becoming the ridiculous ones. Oh how things change :)set
    • all of his "face on mars" bollocksscarabin
    • I'm not claiming to be an expert on it. But here is a whole documentary analyzing his theories: https://www.youtube.…yuekit
    • he's interesting and i like a lot of his ideas but he posts some outrageous woo on his FBscarabin
    • he also changes data to fit his theories. like the locations of temples so they fit his orion alignment theory. and ignores data like the fact that theirscarabin
    • creation date and purpose are literally etched into their stone wallsscarabin
    • LOL at posting a BBC video.set
    • Not even going to bother.set
    • I've not heard him talk about the face on mars so can't comment, but I agree that whole subject might be clutching at straws a bit.set
    • I presume Scarabin, you're the type of person that actually believes the great pyramid was a tomb? (lol)set
    • Face on Mars has little to do with Hancock - you are getting confused with Richard Hoaglandfadein11
    • It's just a video that interviews him and other archaeologists and gives you both sides of the argumentyuekit
    • how do you know?yurimon
    • Why did you ask for debunking if you weren't even willing to consider it?yuekit
    • @set - he never has... Hancock doesn't have time for that kind of thing, as you say he approaches things v.rationally.fadein11
    • Scarabin showed his ignorance by mentioning the face on Mars so lets leave it there - nothing to do with Hancock.fadein11
    • I won't consider for a second something the BBC puts out. If you fail to understand that then we have no place talking about it.set
    • i haven't asserted any of my views apart from his FB posts. set asked for evidence showing graham has been wrong and i gave it to himscarabin
    • took two seconds on google. like i said, i like a lot of his ideas and their drama appeals to me but he's not infallible by any meansscarabin
    • and how is mentioning the face on mars ignorant? it's exactly what set asked for. lol.scarabin
    • i love art bell ahaha forgot about his ass!rabbit
    • You didn't show me a singlev peice of evidence proving him wrong, Scarabin
      ..? Ummm lol?
      set
    • eva dance.yurimon
    • @scarabin - its ignorant because the face on Mars is NOT one of Hancocks theories... At all. Associating him with kind of thing does him a disservice.fadein11
    • read his "keeper of genesis". look at nasa photos.scarabin
    • i get it, he's exciting, it's interesting. all i'm saying is you're hanging from his nuts like he's god or something. the man is stoned 18+ hours a day.scarabin
    • he makes mistakes now and then. no big deal.scarabin
    • Clearly you're utterly clueless on the subject, old friend. He gave up weed like 5-10 years ago. No ones hanging on his nutsack in the slightest.set
    • I'd have a good go if it was in front of me though.set
    • To say that he's never been proven wrong is a bit ridiculous. What he does is look for "clues" of ancient civilizations and then make huge extrapolations fromyuekit
    • that. For instance Antarctica being the site of an ancient advanced society. You can believe his theories if you want but it's really more like he's never beenyuekit
    • proven right.yuekit
    • I do think it's an interesting thing to speculate about, but not sure why you would take this guy's particular theories as gospel.yuekit
    • Who said he's never been proven wrong? Who cares - he has some great ideas. And very believable at that. The face on mars is nothing to do with him Scarabinfadein11
    • you arrogant anus. And yes - he hasn't smoked weed for years. And you can hardly talk acid emo :)fadein11
    • sure, whatever man. you sound like a christian but that's your choice. if you were being objective you would find info about him talking about the face on mars.scarabin
    • i've got no horse in this race, just think it's funny how you two are acting about the guyscarabin
    • carry onscarabin
    • He's interesting and a nice chap with some v.interesting ideas, thats all I was saying. Would be happy for you to provide me with some linksfadein11
    • Why you so bothered?fadein11

View thread