blog

Out of context: Reply #61240

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 75,605 Responses
  • set1

    I imagine within the next ten years they'll amend the dictionary so that 'your' can be used in all senses, to cater for the fucking sludge of retarded oxygen thieves. They've already amended 'literally'for them.

    • See also 'lose' and 'loose'. FUCK!face_melter
    • Alas, some people can still tell the difference.ORAZAL
    • Grammar and spelling are obviously the pinnacle of aptitude and intellect. Pshh, whiney dweeb.gilgamush
    • Only thick fucks make excuses for lack of eloquence and intelligence. If you're going to speak a language, speak it properly you blithering half-wit.set
    • Sum peeps reelly need to do they're homework and work on there brain.Ianbolton
    • Lol. Semanic arguments are the lowest form of debate. Emotional intelligence is more important than grammatical correctness. Eloquence just isn't that importangilgamush
    • *semanticgilgamush
    • Says the ineloquent one. Big is beautuful too!
      No.
      set
    • Lolwutgilgamush
    • Please don't tell me you need that comment explained.set
    • Yea, no you lost me with that one. Must have been far too clevergilgamush

View thread