site critique...

Out of context: Reply #4

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 21 Responses
  • monospaced0

    Pretty beautiful, overall. I first checked it out on my phone, which presented a very nice scrolling site. On the desktop, though, the experience changed. I expected to be able to scroll, but am forced to click and wait through long fades in order to get the whole story. Maybe it's just me, but the waiting was a slight turnoff.

    Also, the type on the desktop is very nice, but just a tad small. Yeah, I'm turning into an old man. I love small type as much as any designer, but maybe at tiny bit bigger?

    Otherwise, the design, layout, concept, and color are gorgeous.

    monospaced 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • wow i hope you're kidding when you say :
      "the design, layout, concept, and color are gorgeous"      i_was
    • I'm not kidding, I think it's very aesthetic, and pointed out areas where it wasn't very good.monospaced
    • Maybe I was focusing mostly on the type choice, colors and SOME of the flow when I spoke of how good it looks.monospaced
    • very aesthetic is not Englishfadein11
    • how so? did you not understand what I meant? if I switch the two words it's more correct, does that help you?monospaced
    • aesthetically pleasingmonospaced
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread