Astrology

Out of context: Reply #24

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 67 Responses
  • gilgamush0

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Neg…

    basic logical fallacy used to convince people into forking over money.
    the quacks that push this brand of mystical shit are the rest of the worlds version of murican televangelists.

    • Like anything else there are good practitioners and bad. just simply saying something is booshit without investigation is dumb and arrogant ignoranceyurimon
    • simply saying something is real without explaining how is even more dumb, and arrogantly ignorant.monospaced
    • exactly what you are doing in fact. you have no experience and just assuming shit because its out of your scope of understanding. i provided starter links.yurimon
    • no, actually I'm not, I simply don't believe the far-fetched claim and am looking for proof, which nobody can provide apparentlymonospaced
    • did you read the link yuri? it explains how saying something is true because someone else can't prove it false is a basic logical fallacy. a non-argumentgilgamush
    • out of ones scope of understanding because it's horse puckey, not cause it's unresearched. could research all day and it'll still be quackerygilgamush

View thread