why is this not true?

Out of context: Reply #15

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 59 Responses
  • yurimon-9

    Thanks for the attempt. Apologize to those who took it the wrong way. However it appears that the ego is very frail in more people then i realized. Once a provocative statement is made to challenge what one knows when an opposite view point is factually lacking. some people go ape shit. resort to name calling. I'm not applying this to those who are being sarcastic of course.

    However in this subject, it seems that there is alot of name calling without evidence to disprove ones opinion. which is unfortunate. Someone on here said "think you're gonna need to read the bible more to properly converse here" In regards to arguing religion and referring to having thorough knowledge of the subject. it seems that idea doesnt extend equally to other subjects. This would be hypocritical to those who embrace equality.

    However I see the biases on here and no one is perfect but I'm sure a few of you on here are decent enough to try to understand when presented with an interested topic that effects our lives and its importance if its true or not. A simple request to debunk whether interest or not did not warrant an attack. Something to ponder. the frail ego? fear of it being true? the lunacy in just hating a subject matter for it stirs something within you?

    Thanks for posting.

    yurimon -9Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Do you REALLY think anyone actually responded to that video, or even watched it? If so, you're crazier than this response.monospaced
    • There's no opposite view point. Nobody watched the first video. People just like you. And the irony again, you started the name calling before anyone.pango
    • If you want to accuse people for name calling perhaps you shouldn't name calling before them. Can your brain process that logic?pango
    • get over it pango. i said i was joking you are still hurt? you guys keep responding while saying you have no interest. lol classic.yurimon
    • I'm not interested in your response if you have no interest so if no on has an interest its ok. keep in mind there is a bias to this subject.yurimon
    • people embrace logic and evidence but when it comes to this its just bias and ignorance without proof or evidence. that is how simple my request was just debunkyurimon
    • you guys cant debunk and get offended. obviously you care because you all keep posting. so it sparks something in you.yurimon
    • This is the internet. You don't always get what you are interested in. Get over it! Everyone's just joking with you. Why you take it so serious.pango
    • Cuz you're such great fun.pango
    • please go through the video and prove every point to be true. you won't do it because it's fucking tedious and nobody gives a shit anyway. same reason we're notscarabin
    • I want to hear other arguments that have some historic context behind it. Dont you agree if you are going to call people nutters you surely have proof and graspyurimon
    • of the subject matter, it by your own logic.
      its ok if you dont have the info. thanks for posting.      yurimon
    • Ha There are so many things we can call you nutter for.pango
    • if you were a critical thinker you'd do it yourself instead of relying on others to craft your worldviewscarabin
    • but we all know that instead you'd rather just troll.scarabin
    • nothing wrong with asking other for opinions. you fackin ap scarybin.yurimon
    • true, but expecting them is ridiculousmonospaced
    • Anyway, what would it mean to you if I told you my grandmother was a Rothschild?monospaced
    • @mono: I would then ask you if you can hook me up with some premium Bordeaux wine for free! :DContinuity
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread