So David Icke was right?

Out of context: Reply #69

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 114 Responses
  • yuekit3

    One thing you can say about these theories...they all seem to view the world through a moral prism. The evil cabal oppressing the masses who without this oppression would achieve their real potential.

    In that respect it's not much different from other ideologies which all blame some external group. Communism which blames capitalists. Feminism which blames men. Right wing groups which blames immigrants.

    Is it possible that the problems and the limitations in the world are real and that blaming some group of elites is just a convenient excuse?

    • lol, real potential? What. The. Fuck. Are you talking about? holy shit your brain makes the weirdest connectionsmonospaced
    • true, natural law principles have a moralist aspect to them. you have factors of consent through none action. divide and conquer seems to work through outyurimon
    • the ages. but I think its more of a cause and effect. action through ignorance of a mass will have an effect. reap what you sow.yurimon
    • collective action or lack of action will yield an effect by those who know how to control unless each individual wakes up and yield proper action collectivelyyurimon
    • the quality of the mass in action will yield proper results. if ignorant fcks act you get what happened in communist revolution. the energy of the mass stolen.yurimon
    • If you still fail to see that diet, education and media is designed to deny humans their true potential, then there is no hope for you.set
    • Why are you so convinced that if you left people to their own devices none of those problems would exist? Why blame someone else? Just solve the problems.yuekit
    • Also when you take such a negative view it ignores the fact that living conditions have been improving for the vast majority of people.yuekit
    • China alone has lifted more people out of poverty in the last 30 years than at any time in human history. So if there are reptilians running things, they'reyuekit
    • doing a great job! You should thank them :)yuekit
    • Their lives are only better because their lives help fund the corporations. No other reason.set
    • Farmers keep their chickens in reasonable conditions.set
    • Hardly proves their not free because they are given water and food and some grass to walk around in.set
    • they're*set
    • Cmon man is your life really that bad? I feel like people have more opportunities and freedom than ever before.yuekit
    • Call me crazy but being forced to work 90% of your life in order to just about live comfortably isn't my idea of the good life.set
    • Which isn't to say there aren't problems in the world but generally speaking it's a good time to be alive.yuekit
    • I love life. I'm fortunate enough to not have to work a 9-5 and live in a wonderful city and share my life with lots of wonderful people. I'm in the 1% thoughset
    • You're living in a fantasy world if you don't think it's designed that way.set
    • If by "designed" you mean a combination of planning, human nature and random circumstances, I can agreeyuekit
    • But if you mean some small group of people trying to control everyone in the world, I think that's way too simple.yuekit
    • but it's fact that a select few families own all of the corporations and control every centralised bank on the planet.set
    • But see that's not really a fact...you may have read it somewhere but I can almost guarantee it is not the full pictureyuekit
    • lol ok. I know what I'm talking about on this one, but it's clear you don't. We'll leave it at that, I think.set
    • set it's easy to debunk. The world's two largest companies are Walmart and a Chinese state owned oil company. You're saying they're owned by the same people??yuekit
    • No. I'm saying a small group of people own all of the large corporations. How can anyone deny that?set
    • Richest man is a Mexican. Is he in on it?monospaced
    • Did you get your information from Zeitgeist?monospaced
    • you said "mean some small group of people trying to control everyone in the world, I think that's way too simple"set
    • Which would suggest that you think the worlds wealth and power is evenly distributed amongst the population. Which is lolcunt worthy.set
    • It's just not accurate. So if that is your starting point it's easy to see how you drew the wrong conclusion about the rest of it.yuekit
    • Tell me which bit is inaccurate and exactly why... Please.set
    • Not evenly distributed. But big difference between that and controlled by a few families.yuekit
    • kset
    • whats happening now is nothing new. kings or rulers, or ruling class all manipulated population through various means of control. same shit. diff populace.yurimon
    • set why be such an obnoxious cunt? I can't believe how polite and logically written yuekits responses are.inteliboy
    • Go fuck yourself, that's why...set

View thread