The Cimate Change Poll

Out of context: Reply #29

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 46 Responses
  • detritus3

    Hmmm. Who to favour?

    Set, an internet commenter with a lot of time on his hands who buys three pairs of shoes a month and a new mobile phone twice a year and who would presumably now want to have his consumer lifestyle ethos impacted upon; Who has one poorly-recalled data point he read once on an 'open minded' left of field news outlet on the internet, backed up by a surfeit of self-conviction and an earnest need to be confrontational for no worthwhile reason, other than contrarianism...

    ...or a global groundswell of scientists and researchers from a swathe of disciplines who have dedicated their lives to their fields and whose competence and respect in those fields is qualified quantitatively by renumeration and employment by relevant and respected institutions, and qualitatively by peer acknowledgment; Who have staring them in the face the thermodynamic consequences of ½Bn years extra atmospheric CO2 deposition in the space of half a millennium*?

    Decisions, decisions!

    .

    *numbers picked put of ass, just to give set something to grab on to.

    • Imma just going to go ahead and downvote myself in advance.detritus
    • Believe in carbon tax exchanges. Bankers know best.yurimon
    • Economists have experience in limiting the over-reach of markets, yes. Adam Smith said as much 300 years ago.detritus
    • Pollution and deforestation are bigger problems. The Ocean is swimming in plastic. You have man made plastic chemicals in your body from birth.yurimon
    • Do you remember Acid Rain? No? Good, that's because we killed it off with Credits and trading allowances 25 years ago.detritus
    • Fukushima radiation in the atmosphere n ocean, fresh water increasingly polluted,
      filterer run off n monsanto toxins in water, also you piss pharmaceuticals.
      yurimon
    • Sure, Yuri, I'm with you, but this is the 'Cimate Change' thread, not the 'hoy in some irrelevant 3rd party argument' threaddetritus
    • ^fertilizer run off. er. You have deforestation. carbon is least of the worries. its a political issue for banker to impose taxes.yurimon
    • Throw in a pejorative like 'banker' (NO ONE likes bankers!) and conflate intent with accident and sure, there's conspiracy everywhere.detritus
    • detritus. well you guys never deal with core issues. climate change debate is still a political issue tied to property rights and agenda 21. look into it,yurimon
    • Aye, I'm well aware of the Left Field's dogged misinterpretation of Agenda 21, thanks, again, this is the Cimate Change thread.detritus
    • Lol at your comments as if you know anything about me. Hahaha what a bizarre twit.set
    • Lol at your comments as if you know anything. Hahaha what a bizarre twit.detritus
    • What a humourously petty little shit you are, haha.set
    • Given a straw poll, I imagine most QBNers probably view you as being the 'petty little shit', quick as you are to insult people.detritus
    • Petty is bringing bizarre personal insults into a debate on climate change, haha.set
    • "I'm not petty, you're petty, do a poll!!!!"

      Nope, not petty at all hahaha
      set
    • We get it, you'll accept whatever propaganda you're spoon-fed and you'll ridicule everything that doesn't fit into your world view. It's ok pal.set
    • I merely distilled your recently-admitted activities. I'm not the one who first bent 'bizarre personal insults' in here - read back again. See? that was you.detritus
    • & lol at you for not seeing the duality in propaganda, how it's more than likely you spoon feeding shit to other mouth-breathing troglodytes. That was an insultdetritus
    • Obviously detritus you have no historic knowledge of how control is gained over people through ignorance. post something true please...yurimon
    • Oh God, whatever - you carry on proselytising your vapid paranoia and ignoring the subject in hand then. Jesus, if only you could see yourself from this side.detritus
    • There is power imbalance in the world with its own interests in conflict with perhaps your interests. it nothing mystical when groups gain power. right now itsyurimon
    • banks, some time ago it was monarchy and the church. each with its pattern of tyranny. nothing changed that much just a different group asserting itself.yurimon
    • blah blah blah — still prattling on irrelevantly? All this hot air's not doing the atmosphere any good, Yuridetritus

View thread